Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 17;12:667511. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.667511

Table 2.

Motor tests.

Methods Purpose Timepoint Apparatus Measurement index Range of normal value
1. Neurologic deficit scale Use in motor function tests D1, D3, D7, D14, and D21 post-ICH (34, 35) None required Each aspect is graded from 0 to 4 points, and the total score ranges from 0 to 24 points 0 point in both mice and rats (34, 35)
2. Corner test Assessing integrated sensorimotor function One day prior to surgery, D1, D3, D7, D14, D28 and D21 post-ICH (34, 35) Two cardboard pieces forming a corner with a 30° angle (36) The percentage of corner turn scores Around 50% in both mice and rats (3639)
3. Staircase test Measuring spontaneous forelimb usage, walking, and skilled reaching ability D6, D28, D29, D30, D31, and D32 post-ICH (40) A plexiglass box with several ladders (40) The number of pellets remaining in each well on the two sides Above nine in both rats and mice (41, 42)
4. Rotarod test Conduction of a double-blind assessment of behavioral function D1, D3, D7, D14, and D21 post-ICH (43) An accelerating rotarod (43) The average retention time of staying in the rotarod For rats: ~150 s (44)
For mice: around 250~300 s (45)
5. Cylinder test Measurement of brain function and assess spontaneous forelimb use in rodents D1, D3, D7, and D14 post-injury (46) Transparent acrylic glass cylinder with a diameter of 7 to 10 cm (46) Results analyzed with the following formula: (contralateral forelimb movement—ipsilateral forelimb movement)/(contralateral forelimb movement + ipsilateral forelimb movement + both movement) Around 0 in normal animals (47)
6. Grid walk test Measurement of sensorimotor coordination in mice D1, D3, D7, and D14 post-injury (48) An overhead grid which connects two tall walls (15) For rats: the numbers of foot faults
For mice: a foot fault index [(Contralateral faults – Ipsilateral faults)/total steps] is calculated
For rats: ~20 times (49, 50)
For mice: <5% (51)
7. Forelimb placing test Assessment of ICH - induced neurological deficits D1, D3, D12, and D28 post-ICH (52, 53) None This forelimb placement experiment was quantified as the percentage of successful responses in 10 trials Nearly 100% in both rats and mice (54, 55)
8. Wire hanging test Evaluation of locomotor abnormalities and behavioral deficits in models of striatal, intra-ventricular, and cortical ICH D1, D3, D7, D14, and D21 post-ICH (56) A temperature-controlled and humidity-controlled room, an iron wire (1 mm in diameter, 55 cm long, 50 cm above the ground) (57) The time that each animal remained on the wire is recorded, and the average time is calculated Around 35 s in mice (58)
9. Beam walking test Measurement of balance and asymmetrical coordination D1, D3, D7, D11, D14, D21, and D28 post-ICH (59) A wooden beam usually 50 cm above the ground for mice, 1 m above the ground for rats (5962) Seven point scale Seven point (63)
10. Horizontal ladder test Evaluation of walking ability D7, D14, D21, D28 post-ICH (6466). A horizontal ladder 30 cm above the ground, and made up of two clear side walls (1 m long and 19 cm high) and several metal rungs (3 mm in diameter) (67, 68). Limb error rate = error steps/total steps × 100% Close to 0 (68)
11. Adhesive removal test Evaluation of sensorimotor neurologic deficits of both forepaws D1, D3, D7, D14, D21 and D28 post-ICH (69, 70) Small adhesive tape pieces (around 4 mm for mice, 6 mm for rats) (64, 7072) The latency of removing the tape is recorded Within 10 s (73)