Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul;11(7):3338–3354. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-91

Table 3. Comparison results with two advanced attention-based modules (%).

Methods MCI vs. NC AD vs. NC AD vs. MCI AD vs. MCI vs. NC
ACC SPE SEN PRE F1 AUC ACC SPE SEN PRE F1 AUC ACC SPE SEN PRE F1 AUC ACC SPE SEN PRE F1 AUC
ResNet 78.0 80.2 75.4 76.7 76.1 84.3 90.5 90.9 89.9 88.7 89.3 95.8 78.6 80.4 76.3 76.2 76.2 85.1 58.5 79.6 59.6 58.4 58.5 64.0
ResNet + SE 79.0 80.2 77.3 77.3 77.3 84.9 89.2 90.1 87.7 87.7 87.7 95.1 78.6 78.0 80.0 75.2 77.4 84.9 61.2 80.6 61.0 60.8 60.9 64.3
ResNet + CBAM 79.3 81.0 77.1 78.0 77.6 84.7 89.1 89.7 88.2 87.3 87.6 95.0 79.0 79.7 78.0 76.1 77.0 85.2 61.3 80.7 61.0 60.8 60.9 64.1
THAN 80.1 80.3 78.2 79.2 78.6 85.0 92.0 93.1 90.3 91.6 90.9 96.2 80.7 81.0 79.9 77.6 78.7 86.2 62.9 81.8 64.5 61.6 62.9 64.9

MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NC, normal control; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; THAN, task-driven hierarchical attention network; CBAM, convolutional block attention module.