Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul;11(7):3338–3354. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-91

Table 4. Comparison results with state-of-the-art methods (%).

Methods MCI vs. NC AD vs. NC AD vs. MCI AD vs. MCI vs. NC
ACC SPE SEN PRE F1 AUC ACC SPE SEN PRE F1 AUC ACC SPE SEN PRE F1 AUC ACC SPE SEN PRE F1 AUC
ROI 77.1 79.7 74.5 76.3 76.0 81.4 83.1 85.6 80.1 81.4 80.7 87.4 70.0 73.0 66.5 67.0 66.8 73.0 58.0 78.9 58.4 57.7 58.0 63.1
Patch 73.5 68.6 78.4 70.6 74.3 79.7 82.9 88.6 75.1 84.6 79.4 90.7 69.1 70.3 67.4 65.4 66.1 76.8 60.5 80.2 60.5 60.0 60.2 63.8
WI 77.7 79.5 75.9 77.5 76.6 86.3 88.1 90.2 85.2 87.6 86.4 94.3 72.4 71.4 73.5 68.1 70.6 78.6 60.9 80.2 63.6 59.8 61.6 63.9
Att 76.0 77.7 74.2 76.3 75.1 82.9 86.1 89.6 82.6 86.3 83.9 93.5 75.5 77.3 72.6 73.9 72.8 81.5 59.8 79.7 60.9 60.1 60.5 64.1
Our 80.1 80.3 78.2 79.2 78.6 85.0 92.0 93.1 90.3 91.6 90.9 96.2 80.7 81.0 79.9 77.6 78.7 86.2 62.9 81.8 64.5 61.6 62.9 64.9

MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NC, normal control; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ROI, region of interest; WI, the whole image-based method; Att, the attention-based method; ACC, accuracy; SPE, specificity; SEN, sensitivity; PRE, precision; F1, F1-score; AUC, area under the curve.