TABLE 4.
First author | Was the study question or objective clearly stated? | Study population clearly and fully described including a case definition | Cases consecutive | Subjects comparable | Intervention clearly described | Outcome measured clearly defined, valid, reliable and implemented consistently | Was length of follow‐up adequate? | Statistical methods well describe? | Were results well described? | Overall rating | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dalal | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Good | |
de‐Mederios | Yes | NA | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Good | |
Elsaie | Yes | Yes | CD | CD | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Freeman | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good | |
Freeman | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good | |
Gianotti | Yes | No | CD | CD | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Good | |
Hassan | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | CD | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Ho | Yes | No | CD | CD | Yes | No | CD | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Khurana | Yes | No | NA | NA | CD | Yes | CD | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Lagziel | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Good | |
Lorenzo‐Villaba | Yes | Yes | CD | CD | Yes | Yes | CD | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Magro | Yes | Yes | CD | CD | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Good | |
Papamichalis | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Good | |
Putra | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | CD | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Rivera‐Oyola | Yes | No | NA | NA | CD | Yes | CD | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Sachdeva | Yes | No | CD | CD | Yes | No | CD | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Sakaida | Yes | No | NA | NA | CD | Yes | CD | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Sanchez | Yes | No | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | CD | NA | Yes | Good | |
Shanshal | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | No | CD | NA | Yes | Fair | |
Suter | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Good |