Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22:e6331. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1002/cpe.6331

TABLE 1.

Comparison of different algorithms on the MAFA data set

Method Front accuracy More side accuracy Side accuracy
Line 17 92.67% 83.40% 88.53%
FSA‐Net 19 74.97% 76.64% 71.20%
EPnP‐LAB 12 90.04% 68.92% 50.13%
Hope‐Net 23 72.16% 76.53% 73.87%
Ours 94.14% 86.58% 90.93%

Note: Through the accuracy of the three classification to show the performance of each algorithm.