Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 21;19(6):1533–1545. doi: 10.1111/jth.15310

TABLE 3.

Anticoagulation on admission to intensive care unit by cohort and increases in anticoagulation intensity following intensive care unit admission by cohort

COVID‐19
N = 443
ORVI
N = 387
p
Anticoagulation intensity on admission to ICU, N (%)
Standard prophylactic 216 (48.8) 252 (65.1) <.001
Intermediate 84 (19.0) 8 (2.1)
Treatment 127 (28.7) 104 (26.9)
Home warfarin held because of therapeutic/supratherapeutic INR 4 (1.0) 4 (1.0)
Nonea 12 (2.7) 19 (4.9)
Anticoagulation intensity increase following ICU admission, N (%)
Yes 189 (59.8) 73 (25.8) <.001
No 127 (40.1) 210 (74.2)
Ineligible (already on therapeutic intensity) 127 (28.7) 104 (26.9)
Reason for increase in anticoagulation intensity, N (%)b
Suspected thrombosis 15 (7.9) 5 (5.5) <.001
Confirmed thrombosis 27 (14.3) 12 (16.4)
Deterioration in clinical status 91 (48.2) 4 (5.5)
Atrial fibrillation or flutter 14 (7.4) 19 (26.0)
Initiation of ECMO 1 (0.53) 8 (11.0)
Concern for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia 1 (0.53) 1 (1.4)
Elevated D‐dimer/concern for hypercoagulability 12 (6.4) 0 (0)
Institutional guidelines 3 (1.6) 0 (0)
Contraindication to anticoagulation resolvedc 6 (3.2) 7 (9.6)
Other/unknown 19 (10.6) 17 (23.2)

Abbreviations: COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; ICU, intensive care unit; INR, international normalized ratio; ORVI, other respiratory virus infection.

a

Patients were not on anticoagulation on day of admission to the ICU. All patients eventually received anticoagulation at a later date.

b

If patient had increase in anticoagulation intensity, the reason for anticoagulation intensity increase was reflected in clinical progress notes.

c

Number of patients who had anticoagulation initially held because of contraindication such as bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, or elevated INR and then resumed anticoagulation when contraindication resolved.