Table 7.
Comparison with other methods.
| Algorithm | Sen | Spc | Prc | Acc | F1 | MCC | FMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRC-BC (Plant et al., 2010) | 92.96 ± 1.63 | 88.78 ± 1.86 | 89.25 ± 1.59 | 90.87 ± 1.11 | 91.05 ± 1.09 | 81.83 ± 2.22 | 91.08 ± 1.09 |
| TJM (Savio and Grana, 2013) | 88.27 ± 3.27 | 92.45 ± 2.37 | 92.20 ± 2.03 | 90.36 ± 1.31 | 90.13 ± 1.44 | 80.88 ± 2.53 | 90.18 ± 1.41 |
| RF (Gray et al., 2013) | 87.86 ± 2.18 | 88.67 ± 1.70 | 88.60 ± 1.55 | 88.27 ± 1.36 | 88.21 ± 1.41 | 76.56 ± 2.72 | 88.22 ± 1.41 |
| FMSA (Lahmiri and Boukadoum, 2014) | 90.31 ± 2.32 | 87.86 ± 2.47 | 88.21 ± 1.93 | 89.08 ± 1.08 | 89.21 ± 1.08 | 78.25 ± 2.13 | 89.23 ± 1.07 |
| DF (Zhang, 2015) | 90.61 ± 1.65 | 93.16 ± 1.18 | 93.00 ± 1.08 | 91.89 ± 0.70 | 91.78 ± 0.75 | 83.83 ± 1.39 | 91.79 ± 0.74 |
| PZM-SCG (Gorji and Haddadnia, 2015) | 92.96 ± 1.63 | 92.65 ± 1.79 | 92.72 ± 1.57 | 92.81 ± 0.70 | 92.82 ± 0.69 | 85.65 ± 1.40 | 92.83 ± 0.69 |
| BBO (Li, 2018) | 91.73 ± 1.83 | 91.43 ± 2.21 | 91.52 ± 1.89 | 91.58 ± 0.60 | 91.60 ± 0.56 | 83.22 ± 1.21 | 91.61 ± 0.57 |
| PZM-LRC (Du, 2017) | 93.37 ± 1.82 | 92.76 ± 2.01 | 92.83 ± 1.81 | 93.06 ± 1.30 | 93.08 ± 1.29 | 86.15 ± 2.59 | 93.09 ± 1.29 |
| CNN-LReLU (Sui, 2018) | 97.35 ± 1.88 | 96.94 ± 1.08 | 96.97 ± 1.01 | 97.14 ± 0.87 | 97.14 ± 0.90 | 94.31 ± 1.72 | 97.15 ± 0.89 |
| CNN-BND (Jiang and Chang, 2020) | 97.04 ± 1.55 | 97.35 ± 1.29 | 97.36 ± 1.24 | 97.19 ± 0.88 | 97.19 ± 0.89 | 94.41 ± 1.73 | 97.19 ± 0.88 |
| CNN-RNN-LSTM (Dua et al., 2020) | 92.65 ± 1.65 | 92.35 ± 1.30 | 92.38 ± 1.19 | 92.50 ± 1.02 | 92.51 ± 1.04 | 85.02 ± 2.04 | 92.51 ± 1.04 |
| Ours | 97.65 ± 1.36 | 97.86 ± 1.55 | 97.87 ± 1.53 | 97.76 ± 1.13 | 97.75 ± 1.13 | 95.53 ± 2.27 | 97.76 ± 1.13 |