Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 18;13:687456. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.687456

Table 7.

Comparison with other methods.

Algorithm Sen Spc Prc Acc F1 MCC FMI
BRC-BC (Plant et al., 2010) 92.96 ± 1.63 88.78 ± 1.86 89.25 ± 1.59 90.87 ± 1.11 91.05 ± 1.09 81.83 ± 2.22 91.08 ± 1.09
TJM (Savio and Grana, 2013) 88.27 ± 3.27 92.45 ± 2.37 92.20 ± 2.03 90.36 ± 1.31 90.13 ± 1.44 80.88 ± 2.53 90.18 ± 1.41
RF (Gray et al., 2013) 87.86 ± 2.18 88.67 ± 1.70 88.60 ± 1.55 88.27 ± 1.36 88.21 ± 1.41 76.56 ± 2.72 88.22 ± 1.41
FMSA (Lahmiri and Boukadoum, 2014) 90.31 ± 2.32 87.86 ± 2.47 88.21 ± 1.93 89.08 ± 1.08 89.21 ± 1.08 78.25 ± 2.13 89.23 ± 1.07
DF (Zhang, 2015) 90.61 ± 1.65 93.16 ± 1.18 93.00 ± 1.08 91.89 ± 0.70 91.78 ± 0.75 83.83 ± 1.39 91.79 ± 0.74
PZM-SCG (Gorji and Haddadnia, 2015) 92.96 ± 1.63 92.65 ± 1.79 92.72 ± 1.57 92.81 ± 0.70 92.82 ± 0.69 85.65 ± 1.40 92.83 ± 0.69
BBO (Li, 2018) 91.73 ± 1.83 91.43 ± 2.21 91.52 ± 1.89 91.58 ± 0.60 91.60 ± 0.56 83.22 ± 1.21 91.61 ± 0.57
PZM-LRC (Du, 2017) 93.37 ± 1.82 92.76 ± 2.01 92.83 ± 1.81 93.06 ± 1.30 93.08 ± 1.29 86.15 ± 2.59 93.09 ± 1.29
CNN-LReLU (Sui, 2018) 97.35 ± 1.88 96.94 ± 1.08 96.97 ± 1.01 97.14 ± 0.87 97.14 ± 0.90 94.31 ± 1.72 97.15 ± 0.89
CNN-BND (Jiang and Chang, 2020) 97.04 ± 1.55 97.35 ± 1.29 97.36 ± 1.24 97.19 ± 0.88 97.19 ± 0.89 94.41 ± 1.73 97.19 ± 0.88
CNN-RNN-LSTM (Dua et al., 2020) 92.65 ± 1.65 92.35 ± 1.30 92.38 ± 1.19 92.50 ± 1.02 92.51 ± 1.04 85.02 ± 2.04 92.51 ± 1.04
Ours 97.65 ± 1.36 97.86 ± 1.55 97.87 ± 1.53 97.76 ± 1.13 97.75 ± 1.13 95.53 ± 2.27 97.76 ± 1.13