TABLE 2.
Change in food security status from T1 to T2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall (N = 433) | Became food insecure (n = 27) | Stayed food insecure (n = 173) | Became food secure (n = 65) | Stayed food secure (n = 168) | p value | |
Total food | <0.01 | |||||
Increased (%) | 26.6 | 18.5 | 18.5 | 38.5 | 31.2 | |
Decreased (%) | 21.0 | 29.6 | 44.1 | 6.2 | 2.9 | |
Stayed the same (%) | 52.4 | 51.9 | 37.5 | 55.4 | 65.9 | |
High‐calorie snack foods | <0.01 | |||||
Increased (%) | 17.3 | 18.5 | 16.1 | 18.5 | 17.9 | |
Decreased (%) | 29.3 | 33.3 | 41.7 | 26.2 | 17.9 | |
Stayed the same (%) | 53.4 | 48.2 | 42.3 | 55.4 | 64.2 | |
Desserts and sweets | <0.01 | |||||
Increased (%) | 15.5 | 3.7 | 14.3 | 15.4 | 18.5 | |
Decreased (%) | 32.8 | 37.0 | 47.0 | 30.8 | 19.1 | |
Stayed the same (%) | 51.7 | 59.3 | 38.7 | 53.9 | 62.4 | |
Fresh foods | <0.01 | |||||
Increased (%) | 36.3 | 44.4 | 32.7 | 49.2 | 33.5 | |
Decreased (%) | 17.3 | 18.5 | 32.1 | 7.7 | 6.4 | |
Stayed the same (%) | 46.4 | 37.0 | 35.1 | 43.1 | 60.1 | |
Nonperishable processed food | <0.01 | |||||
Increased (%) | 33.3 | 44.4 | 40.5 | 35.4 | 23.7 | |
Decreased (%) | 17.3 | 7.4 | 21.4 | 13.9 | 16.2 | |
Stayed the same (%) | 49.4 | 48.2 | 38.1 | 50.8 | 60.1 |
Note: Results presented for the overall sample and by categories indicating changes in food security status across two timepoints during COVID‐19.
Increased = greater at T2, compared to T1, during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Decreased = lower at T2, compared to T1, during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Stayed the same = no reported change from T1 to T2 during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
p Values represent significance for chi‐square analyses conducted for home food environment variables by food security status (3 × 4) to indicate overall distribution differences.
Abbreviations: COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; T1, timepoint 1 (May 2020); T2, timepoint 2 (September 2020).