Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;36(6):3011–3034. doi: 10.1002/int.22410

Table 1.

Linguistic terms to evaluate the alternatives 51

Linguistic terms Interval type‐2 fuzzy sets
Very poor (VP) ((0, 1, 1, 3; 1, 1), (0.5, 1, 1, 2; 0.9, 0.9))
Poor (P) ((1, 3, 3, 5; 1, 1), (2, 3, 3, 4; 0.9, 0.9))
Fair (F) ((3, 5, 5, 7; 1, 1), (4, 5, 5, 6; 0.9, 0.9))
Medium good (MG) ((5, 7, 7, 9; 1, 1), (6, 7, 7, 8; 0.9, 0.9))
Good (G) ((7, 9, 9, 10; 1, 1), (8, 9, 9, 9.5; 0.9, 0.9))
Very good (VG) ((9, 10, 10, 10; 1, 1), (9.5, 10, 10, 10; 0.9, 0.9))

This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.