Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 23;236(10):7045–7057. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30367

Table 1.

The HADDOCK predicted docking score for all the mutant complexes and additional parameters including cluster size, vdW energy, electrostatic energy, and Z‐score are given. The table also tabulate the KD (dissociation constant) for each complex predicted by PRODIGY (PROtein binDIng enerGY prediction) is also given

Parameters Wild E484K N501Y E484K‐N501Y K417N‐ E484K‐N501Y K417T‐ E484K‐N501Y
HADDOCK score −122.6 ± /−0.7 −128.8 ± 2.6 −122.4 ± /− 1.1 −126.5 ± 3.0 −127.6 ± 1.1 −127.0 ± 1.4
Cluster size 64 61 71 92 86 64
RMSD 1.7 ± 1.0 0.5 ± /− 0.5 0.5 ± 0.4 1.1 ± 0.7 5.8 ± 0.6 0.8 ± 0.5
Van der Waals energy −59.6 ± 2.3 −53.6 ± /− 5.3 −55.2 ± 1.9 −59.2 ± 7.5 −58.2 ± 8.1 −61.6 ± 2.6
Electrostatic energy −181.4 ± 15.5 −274.1 ± /− 10.0 −205.8 ± 10.3 −182.4 ± 24.3 −212.2 ± 39.0 −207.7 ± 15.2
Desolvation energy −27.1 ± 3.4 −20.8 ± /− 4.7 −28.2 ± 2.0 −33.0 ± 1.4 −30.1 ± 3.3 −26.0 ± 2.0
Restraints violation energy 4.7 ± 3.8 4.0 ± /− 1.4 20.8 ± 18.1 21.7 ± 11.0 31.6 ± 21.4 20.4 ± 13.5
Buried Surface Area 1965.3 ± 120.6 1899.9 ± /− 93.2 1819.3 ± 36.0 1755.9 ± 61.8 1894.9 ± 97.5 1938.6 ± 67.1
Z‐score −1.9 −1.4 −1.4 −1.2 −1.4 −1.6
Prodigy binding score −13.2 −13.6 −13.1 −12.8 −12.8 −13.3
KD (dissociation constant) 5.2E−10 3.0E−10 6.6E−10 9.4E−10 4.2E−10 4.2E−08