Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 8;52(3):375–390. doi: 10.1111/agec.12624

TABLE 2.

Comparison of key assumptions for April and September 2020 MIRAGRODEP‐COVID 19 scenarios

Scenario
April 2020 September 2020
Health and pandemic projections Imperial College (Walker et al., 2020); March 26th version London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Pearson et al., 2020); June 5th, 2020 version)
Health (nonpharmaceutical) mitigation policies Imperial College, “Social distancing of the whole population” scenario for all countries Countries mapped to 10 types of responses based on policy descriptions and mobility metrics (Google, 2020; per August 4th, 2020)
Social distancing parameter (e.g., number of workdays lost) 12 weeks of confinement in each country, except for Africa (8 weeks) Adjusted allowing for country specificities within region (see above)
Value chain disruptions Postharvest losses for perishable products: +5 points Postharvest losses for perishable products: +5 points
Transportation and logistics 5% reduction in total factor productivity (TFP) in transport sector 5% reduction in total factor productivity (TFP) in transport sector
Preference shifter for face‐to‐face services Uniform 25% “shadow tax” equivalent Country‐specific “shadow tax,” scaled to social distancing intensity (tax ranging between 13% and 45%)

This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.