Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15312

Table 2. Crude Event Rates and Cumulative and Adjusted Cumulative Incidence Estimate Rates.

Treatment cohort Evaluable patients at time 0a Time interval, y Events, No. Competing risk events, No. Patients censored, No.b No. at risk (end of interval) Cumulative incidence at end of interval (95% CI)c Adjusted cumulative incidence at end of interval (95% CI)d
Prostate cancer-specific mortality
All RP 2892 0-5 99 194 1561 1038 5.2 (4.3-6.2) 5.3 (3.9-7.2)
5-10 55 77 666 240 13.3 (11.7-15.2) 13.3 (10.7-16.7)
All EBRT 1767 0-5 67 151 403 1146 4.0 (3.2-5.0) 4.6 (3.7-5.8)
5-10 66 136 489 455 10.3 (8.9-12.1) 11.7 (9.7-14.2)
All EBRT+BT 911 0-5 24 62 184 641 3.6 (2.8-4.6) 4.1 (3.6-5.4)
5-10 34 74 318 215 9.3 (7.4-11.7) 10.3 (8.1-13.1)
Optimal RP 1462 0-5 35 101 764 562 3.6 (2.8-4.6) 3.4 (2.4-4.8)
5-10 18 45 365 134 9.3 (7.3-11.9) 8.2 (6.3-10.6)
Optimal EBRT 852 0-5 28 53 166 605 3.3 (2.4-4.5) 3.3 (2.3-4.8)
5-10 31 63 260 251 8.4 (6.5-11.3) 8.1 (6.0-10.7)
Optimal EBRT+BT 402 0-5 7 19 58 318 2.8 (2.1-3.9) 3.4 (2.3-5.0)
5-10 13 37 153 115 7.4 (5.3-10.3) 8.1 (5.6-11.7)
Distant metastasis
All RP 2929 0-5 452 197 1352 928 20.3 (18.8-22.1) 18.4 (16.7-20.2)
5-10 109 72 540 207 32.7 (30.3-35.3) 30.2 (27.6-33.1)
All EBRT 1793 0-5 176 152 384 1081 11.2 (9.8-12.3) 11.7 (10.1-13.5)
5-10 81 143 435 422 18.4 (16.5-20.4) 19.7 (17.3-22.4)
All EBRT+BT 973 0-5 61 74 172 666 6.3 (5.2-7.6) 6.8 (5.4-8.4)
5-10 26 106 302 232 10.7 (8.8-13.0) 11.6 (9.5-14.3)
Optimal RP 1539 0-5 163 102 750 524 15 (13.3-17.12) 13.4 (11.7-15.4)
5-10 56 45 309 114 26.8 (23.7-30.2) 23.5 (20.3-27.2)
Optimal EBRT 863 0-5 76 53 158 576 9.1 (7.5-11.1) 8.7 (7.1-10.6)
5-10 42 66 234 234 16.7 (14.3-19.6) 16.1 (13.4-19.3)
Optimal EBRT+BT 447 0-5 18 27 55 347 3.9 (2.5-5.9) 4.2 (2.8-6.2)
5-10 12 57 149 129 7.3 (5.3-10.1) 7.8 (5.5-11.1)

Abbreviations: BT, brachytherapy boost; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; RP, radical prostatectomy.

a

Numbers at baseline differ for prostate cancer-specific survival and distant metastasis-free survival because not all patients had known cause-of-death information to compute prostate cancer–specific survival.

b

Patients were censored if they were lost to follow-up, if they had not experienced the event of interest at last follow-up, or if they experienced an event such that they were no longer at risk for the event of interest.

c

Unadjusted cumulative incidence estimates were generated Fine and Gray methods for competing risk.

d

Adjusted cumulative incidence estimates were generated using Fine and Gray methods for competing risk with inverse probability of treatment weights, calculated using propensity scores that were determined using multinomial logistic regression with treatment cohort as the outcome and site-centered age at treatment, natural log of initial prostate-specific antigen level, clinical T stage, and Gleason grade group as pretreatment, prognostic covariates.