Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 6;40(3):929–937. doi: 10.1002/nau.24651

Table 5.

Related factors with global satisfaction of the teleconsultation rated by the patients

Means (SD)/ρ p Multivariate analysis, β (p)
Age a −0.06 0.25 1.0 (0.23)
Sex a 0.34
Female 9.0 ± 1.3 Reference
Male 9.1 ± 1.2 1.1 (0.39)
Etiology 0.33
Multiple sclerosis 9.1 ± 1.2
Spinal cord injury 9.2 ± 1.1
Cauda equina syndrome or lower motoneuron disease 8.8 ± 1.3
Spina‐bifida or mixt 9.0 ± 1.1
Neurological‐others (supra‐pontic disease) 8.8 ± 1.8
Cognitive impairment a 0.05
No 9.1 ± 1.1 Reference
Yes 8.8 ± 1.5 0.63 (0.006)*
Mobility aids a 0.57
None 9.0 ± 1.2 Reference
Walking stick/walker 9.0 ± 1.4 1.2 (0.22)
Wheelchair 9.2 ± 1.1 1.6 (0.08)
Number of past appointments in the department −0.05 0.35
Distance between patient's home and the department a 0.03 0.60 1.0 (0.50)
Duration of the TCS 0.01 0.91
Satisfaction of being phoned by the physician b 0.55 <0.001* 1.9 (<0.001)*
Embarrassing nature of the TCS b −0.24 <0.001* 0.8 (<0.001)*
Enough time for the TCS b 0.06
No 7.5 ± 2.6 Reference
Yes 9.1 ± 1.1 1.7 (0.13)
Obtaining all the answers to queries b 0.04*
No 7.8 ± 2.4 Reference
Yes 9.1 ± 1.1 1.9 (0.04)
Preference of a physical consultation b <0.001*
No 9.4 ± 1.0 Reference
Without opinion 9.1 ± 1.2 0.9 (0.72)
Yes 8.7 ± 1.4 0.8 (0.02)*

Note: Number of patients = 358.

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; TCS, telephone consultation.

a

Linear regression model a with demographic data.

b

Linear regression model b with evaluation of the teleconsultation data.

*

p < 0.05.

This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.