TABLE 2.

Methodological quality of included studies (adapted from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports)

Checklist questions	Aguilar‐Gálvez et al. (2020) (18)	Chavarría‐Bolaños et al. (2020) (13)	Galibourg et al. (2020) (17)	Gardner et al. (2020) (21)	Gyurko et al. (2020) (22)	Kakadia et al. (2020) (23)	Mladenovic et al. (2020) (24)	Moore et al. (2020) (25)
Were learner population's demographic and social characteristics clearly described?	No	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No
Was the learner population's history clearly described (considering the analyzed context)?	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Was the current educational situation of the learners in the context clearly described?	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Were assessment methods and the results clearly described (pre‐intervention)?	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	No	Yes
Was the intervention(s) or procedure(s) / resource(s) (learning technology) or (learning model) clearly described?	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Were the post‐intervention outcomes clearly described?	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Were unwanted or unanticipated events identified and described?	No	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Does the experience report provide takeaway lessons?	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Methodological quality *	Moderate	Moderate	Moderate	Moderate	Moderate	High	Moderate	Moderate

Checklist questions	Nair et al. (2020) (26)	Omar et al. (2020) (27)	Pani & Vieira (2020) (28)	Patel et al. (2020) (19)	Patterson et al. (2020) (20)	Spalding et al. (2020) (15)	Tuladhar et al. (2020) (14)	Zhong et al. (2020) (16)
Were learner population's demographic and social characteristics clearly described?	No	No	No	No	No	No	Yes	No
Was the learner population's history clearly described (considering the analyzed context)?	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Was the current educational situation of the learners in the context clearly described?	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Were assessment methods and the results clearly described (pre‐intervention)?	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes
Was the intervention(s) or procedure(s) / resource(s) (learning technology) or (learning model) clearly described?	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Were the post‐intervention outcomes clearly described?	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Were unwanted or unanticipated events identified and described?	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	No
Does the experience report provide takeaway lessons?	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Methodological quality *	Moderate	Moderate	High	Moderate	Moderate	High	Moderate	Moderate

^*Low quality: 1–3 “yes” answers; Moderate quality: 4–6 “yes” answers; High quality: 7 or 8 “yes” answers.