Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 24;6(1):65–76. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1732

TABLE 1.

Baseline Demographic Parameters, Feasibility, Patient‐Centered Outcomes, and Impact of Telehepatology Services

Parameter All Surveyed Patients (n = 210) Satisfied (n = 179) Unsatisfied (n = 31) P Value*
Age (years) 46 (35‐56) 46 (35‐56) 46 (35‐50) 0.751
Male : female 142:68 119:60 23:08 0.397
Socioeconomic status (MKS)
Upper class 3 (1.4) 2 (1.1) 1 (3.2) 0.597
Upper middle class 56 (26.7) 50 (27.9) 6 (19.4)
Lower middle class 75 (35.7) 64 (35.8) 11 (35.5)
Upper lower class 76 (36.2) 63 (35.2) 13 (41.9)
Lower class 0 0 0
Population (rural : urban) 128:82 106:73 22:09 0.216
Comorbidities present 73 (34.8) 59 (32.9) 14 (45.2) 0.467
Diagnosis
Cirrhosis 78 (37.1) 66 (36.9) 12 (38.7)
Compensated cirrhosis 14 (17.9) 13 (19.7) 1 (8.30
Decompensated cirrhosis 64 (82.1) 53 (80.3) 11 (91.7) 0.787
Cirrhosis with HCC 24 (11.4) 19 (10.6) 5 (16.1)
Chronic viral hepatitis 68 (32.4) 60 (33.5) 8 (25.8)
NAFLD 16 (7.6) 14 (7.8) 2 (6.5)
ALD 4 (1.9) 4 (2.2) 0 (0.0)
NCPH 4 (1.9) 3 (1.7) 1 (3.2)
Acute hepatitis 10 (4.8) 9 (5.0) 1 (3.2)
EHBO 11(5.3) 9 (5.0) 2 (6.5)
Others 19 (9.0) 14 (7.8) 5 (16.1)
Hepatology consultation
First time 101 (48.1) 87 (48.4) 14 (45.2) 0.783
Follow‐up 109 (51.9) 92 (51.4) 17 (54.8)
Mode of communication
Audio call 114 (54.3) 99 (55.3) 15 (48.4) 0.559
Hybrid (audio and video) call 96 (45.7) 80 (44.7) 16 (51.6)
Source of information for teleconsultation
Health care worker
Relatives/friends 108 (51.4) 90 (50.3) 18 (58.1) 0.679
Internet 51 (24.3) 46 (25.7) 5 (16.1)
Newspaper 27 (12.9) 22 (12.3) 5(16.1)
24 (11.4) 21 (11.7) 3 (9.7)
Notification rate 205 (97.6) 176 (98.3) 29 (93.5) 0.759
Compliance to treatment 173 (82.4) 151 (84.4) 22 (71.1) 0.071
Suitability rate 173 (82.4) 163 (91.1) 23 (74.2) 0.006
Unexpected return rate 41 (19.6) 14 (7.8) 27 (87.1) <0.001
Patient preference during COVID‐19
Telemedicine 176 (83.8) 153 (85.5) 23 (74.2) 0.115
Physical OPD 34 (16.2) 26 (14.5) 8 (25.8)
Patient preference if no COVID‐19
Telemedicine 56 (26.7) 54 (30.2) 2 (6.5)
Physical OPD 133 (63.3) 107 (59.8) 26 (83.9) 0.018
Both 21 (10) 18 (10.1) 3(9.7)
Patient comfort level
Very uncomfortable 12 (5.7) 0 (0.0 12 (38.7)
Somewhat uncomfortable 2 (0.9) 0 (0.0) 2 (6.5) <0.001
Neither 18 (8.6) 6 (3.4) 12 (38.7)
Somewhat comfortable 49 (23.3) 46 (25.7) 3 (9.7)
Very comfortable 129 (61.4) 127 (70.9) 2 (6.5)
Acceptability/satisfaction rate
Very dissatisfied 13 (6.2) 0 (0.0) 13 (41.9)
Somewhat dissatisfied 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.2)
Neither 17 (8.1) 0 (0.0) 17 (54.8) <0.001
Somewhat satisfied 52 (24.8) 52 (29.1) 0 (0.0)
Very satisfied 127 (60.5) 127 (70.9) 0 (0.0)
Level of understanding
Very poor 8 (3.8) 0 (0.0) 8 (25.8)
Somewhat poor 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.2)
Neither 24 (11.4) 7 (3.9) 17 (54.8) <0.001
Somewhat good 41 (19.5) 38 (21.2) 3 (9.7)
Very good 139 (66.2) 134 (74.9) 2 (6.5)
Improvement rate 104 (49.5) 97 (54.2) 7 (22.6) 0.001
Diagnosis rate 197 (94.0) 170 (95.0) 27 (87.1) 0.093
Success rate 97 (46.2) 97 (54.2) 0 (0.0) <0.001
QOL improvement
Physical 141 (67.1%) 125 (69.8) 16 (51.6) 0.046
Mental 174 (82.8%) 168 (93.9) 6 (19.4) <0.001

Data are presented as median (IQR), n (%).

*P < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Abbreviations: ALD, alcohol‐associated liver disease; EHBO, extrahepatic biliary obstruction; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NCPH, noncirrhotic portal hypertension.