Skip to main content
. 2021 May 10;73(6):921–930. doi: 10.1002/art.41623

Table 2.

Generalized estimating equations (conducted on 20 imputed data sets) of the effect of ACPAs on baseline and longitudinal change in absolute BMD and Z scores and the association between ACPAs and the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis over time*

Dutch cohort Swedish cohort
Lumbar spine Left hip (total hip) Lumbar spine Left hip (femoral neck)
ACPA‐positive ACPA‐negative P ACPA‐positive ACPA‐negative P ACPA‐positive ACPA‐negative P ACPA‐positive ACPA‐negative P
Absolute BMD, g/cm2
Baseline EMM, (95% CI) 1.01 (1.00, 1.03) 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) 0.03 0.92 (0.91, 0.93) 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) 0.01 1.10 (1.06, 1.14) 1.13 (1.10, 1.17) 0.12 0.85 (0.83, 0.88) 0.90 (0.86, 0.94) 0.22
Yearly change, β (95% CI) −0.002 (−0.004, 0.001) 0.0004 (−0.004, 0.004) 0.61 −0.003 (−0.006, −0.001) −0.004 (−0.008, 0.00002) 0.89 0.003 (−0.002, 0.009) 0.003 (−0.002, 0.009) 0.95 −0.003 (−0.007, 0.001) −0.003 (−0.009, 0.002) 0.92
Z score
Baseline EMM, (95% CI) 0.32 (0.16, 0.47) 0.62 (0.38, 0.86) 0.04 0.18 (0.08, 0.29) 0.48 (0.33, 0.63) <0.01 −0.15 (−0.36, 0.06) 0.02 (−0.21, 0.26) 0.13 −0.22 (−0.45, 0.00) −0.06 (−0.28, 0.17) 0.12
Yearly change, β (95% CI) 0.038 (0.017, 0.058) 0.060 (0.027, 0.094) 0.43 0.008 (−0.007, 0.023) 0.001 (−0.022, 0.025) 0.37 0.035 (0.005, 0.064) 0.033 (0.002, 0.064) 0.93 0.004 (−0.026, 0.034) 0.003 (−0.031, 0.037) 0.98
Prevalence of osteopenia, no. (%)
Baseline 94 (38.4) 50 (37.6) 0.48 37 (33.0) 16 (20.2) 0.04
5 years 77 (43.8) 31 (38.8) 0.65 34 (38.6) 25 (39.7)
10 years 26 (44.1) 15 (32.6) 0.56
Prevalence of osteoporosis, no. (%)
Baseline 21 (8.6) 9 (6.8) 0.33 33 (29.5) 26 (32.9) 0.54
5 years 14 (8.0) 4 (5.0) 0.66 28 (31.8) 14 (22.2)
10 years 14 (23.7) 12 (26.0) 0.73
*

Models were adjusted for the following baseline variables: age, sex, body mass index, symptom duration, and smoking status. Models were also adjusted for the following longitudinal time‐varying measurements: Disease Activity Score, prednisone intake, Health Assessment Questionnaire score, C‐reactive protein levels, and serum 25‐hydroxyvitamin D levels (the latter only available for the Dutch cohort). Absolute bone mineral density (BMD) and Z score values are shown as point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) representing the estimated marginal means (EMMs) for baseline BMD and parameter estimates (β) for yearly change BMD. Osteopenia was defined as a T score between −2.5 (a value of −2.5 not included) and −1.0 (a value of −1.0 included) at any location, and osteoporosis was defined as a T score of less than or equal to −2.5 at any location. In the final generalized estimating equations model, osteopenia was defined as “at least osteopenia”, indicating a T score of less than or equal to −1.0, with a T score of more than −1.0 as reference. Osteoporosis was defined in a similar manner as osteopenia, with comparison groups using a T score of less than or equal to −2.5 versus a T score of more than −2.5 as reference. P values were calculated using Wald’s chi‐square test of model effects for anti–citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) (e.g., baseline) and for the ACPA × time interaction (e.g., yearly change).

Difference between the groups remained significant after correction for multiple testing.

Yearly change P value with ACPA‐negative as reference group.