Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;60(26):14410–14414. doi: 10.1002/anie.202102862

Table 2.

Optimization of the asymmetric synthesis of 3 a. Inline graphic

Entry[a]

Ligand

Solvent

Yield [%][b]

e.r.[c]

1

L8

THF

15

64:36

2

L11

THF

30

51:49

3

L12

THF

31

50:50

4

L15

THF

40

73:27

5

L18

THF

79

56:44

6

L19

THF

20

76:24

7

L21

THF

15

66:34

8

L24

THF

98

77:23

9[d]

L24

THF

99

80:20

10[d,e]

L24

THF

98

80:20

[a] Reaction conditions: 2 a (0.236 mmol), Pd2dba3 (5 mol %), ligand (10 mol % for bidentate, 20 mol % for monodentate), 1 a (0.590 mmol), LiCl (0.283 mmol), H2O (26 μL), KOtBu (0.472 mmol), solvent (1.18 mL), room temperature, overnight. [b] Determined by 1H NMR analysis using 2,5‐dimethylfuran as an internal standard. [c] Determined by SFC analysis on a chiral stationary phase. [d] 1 a: 0.826 mmol. [e] PdCl2 (10 mol %) and L24 (40 mol %) were used instead of Pd2dba3.