Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;147(8):729–738. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1276

Table 1. Study Population Characteristics.

Characteristic Healthy participants (n = 17) Participants with vestibular loss (n = 13) ES (95% CI)a UVL (n = 8) BVL (n = 5) ES (95% CI)b
Age, mean (SD), y 39.27 (11.20) 60.50 (10.81) −1.93 (−2.81 to −1.06) 61.66 (12.09) 58.65 (9.39) 0.08 (−1.03 to 1.20)
Female sex, No. (%) 13 (76) 6 (46) 0.76 (0.63 to 0.89) 3 (38) 3 (60) NR
BMI, mean (SD) 25.96 (4.36) 26.16 (4.90) −0.04 (−0.76 to 0.68) 25.35 (3.91) 27.45 (6.48) 0.22 (−0.90 to 1.34)
Height, mean (SD), m 1.72 (0.09) 1.75 (0.08) −0.37 (−1.09 to 0.36) 1.74 (0.09) 1.77 (0.06) 0.10 (−1.02 to 1.22)
History of falls, No. (%) 1 (6) 5 (39) 1.07 (0.92 to 1.21) 4 (50) 1 (20) NR

Abbreviations: BVL, bilateral vestibular loss; BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); ES, effect size (Cohen d); NR, not reported because of small sample size for the χ2 statistic; UVL, unilateral vestibular loss.

a

These ESs are based on the t statistic from 2-tailed t tests.

b

These ESs are based on P values (adjusted using the Tukey method for honestly significant difference) from pairwise comparisons for adults with UVL vs those with BVL within 1-way analysis of variance.