Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021 Jun 18;13(25):29936–29948. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c06478

Figure 2. Inhibitory effects of ultrasmall MoS2 quantum dots on Aβ.

Figure 2.

(A) Aβ (50 μM) aggregation in the presence and absence of ultrasmall MoS2 QDs at the molar ratio of 1:0.5 and 1:5 (Aβ/MoS2 QDs), monitored by a ThT fluorescence kinetic assay. ThT (100 μM) was used as control and data points were depicted as mean values of repeated measurements (n=3) ± standard errors of the mean (SEM) via two-tailed Student’s t-test analyzed at 18 h timepoint, *compared with Aβ, P < 0.05. (B) Secondary structure distribution of incubated (1, 12 and 30 h) Aβ 50 μM in the presence and absence of ultrasmall MoS2 QDs. Secondary structure analysis (%) was derived after deconvolution of the respective ATR-FTIR raw spectra presented in Figures S5&S6. (C-G) TEM imaging of Aβ aggregation in the presence and absence of ultrasmall MoS2 QDs. Aβ concentration: 50 μM. Incubation: 12 h for panel C and 30 h for panels D-G.