Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;14(12):2591–2600. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202100623

Table 4.

TON, TOF, and PMI values of optimized HCS.[a]

graphic file with name CSSC-14-2591-g005.jpg

Entry

2

1 [equiv.]

Ligand [mol %]

CuI [mol %]

T [°C]

t [h]

Cycles

Overall yield[b] [%]

TON[c]

TOF[c] [h−1]

PMI

PMI[d] with recovery

1

2 a

1.05

TPPTS (0.6)

0.05

30

3

5

95

2375

158

7.3

2.9

2

2 a

1.05

TPPTS (0.4)

60

3

4

93

1860

155

7.6

3.0

3

2 b

1.2

sSPhos (0.6)

0.05

60

4

3

90

1380

112

7.9

3.0

4

2 c

1.2

sSPhos (0.6)

60

4

4

88

1760

110

8.2

3.4

[a] All reactions were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere with a 2.5 m concentration; the conversions were measured by HPLC at the end of each cycle, being always higher than 90 %. [b] The yield was obtained combining all the crude extracts. The reaction could be also performed by recycling the distilled cyclohexane in the following extraction process; however, this option was not used for PMI calculation. [c] TON and TOF were calculated considering the average yield and the overall reaction time. [d] PMI was recalculated after recovery of cyclohexane (95 %), TMG (95 %), HEP (95 %), and palladium (90 %), see the Supporting Information for the detailed calculation.