Table 4.
TON, TOF, and PMI values of optimized HCS.[a]
|
| ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Entry |
2 |
1 [equiv.] |
Ligand [mol %] |
CuI [mol %] |
T [°C] |
t [h] |
Cycles |
Overall yield[b] [%] |
TON[c] |
TOF[c] [h−1] |
PMI |
PMI[d] with recovery |
|
1 |
2 a |
1.05 |
TPPTS (0.6) |
0.05 |
30 |
3 |
5 |
95 |
2375 |
158 |
7.3 |
2.9 |
|
2 |
2 a |
1.05 |
TPPTS (0.4) |
– |
60 |
3 |
4 |
93 |
1860 |
155 |
7.6 |
3.0 |
|
3 |
2 b |
1.2 |
sSPhos (0.6) |
0.05 |
60 |
4 |
3 |
90 |
1380 |
112 |
7.9 |
3.0 |
|
4 |
2 c |
1.2 |
sSPhos (0.6) |
– |
60 |
4 |
4 |
88 |
1760 |
110 |
8.2 |
3.4 |
[a] All reactions were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere with a 2.5 m concentration; the conversions were measured by HPLC at the end of each cycle, being always higher than 90 %. [b] The yield was obtained combining all the crude extracts. The reaction could be also performed by recycling the distilled cyclohexane in the following extraction process; however, this option was not used for PMI calculation. [c] TON and TOF were calculated considering the average yield and the overall reaction time. [d] PMI was recalculated after recovery of cyclohexane (95 %), TMG (95 %), HEP (95 %), and palladium (90 %), see the Supporting Information for the detailed calculation.