Table 1.
Accession | Species | Whitefly classification | Thrips classification |
---|---|---|---|
LA2172 | S. arcanum | susceptible | resistant |
LA1401a | S. cheesmaniae | susceptible | resistant |
LA1840 | S. chmielewskii | susceptible | susceptible |
LA2695 | S. chmielewskii | resistant | resistant |
LA0407 | S. habrochaites | susceptible | resistant |
LA1777 | S. habrochaites | resistant | resistant |
PI134418 | S. habrochaites | resistant | resistant |
LYC4 | S. habrochaites | resistant | resistant |
LA1718 | S. habrochaites | resistant | susceptible |
PI127826 | S. habrochaites | resistant | susceptible |
LA1364 | S. huaylasense | susceptible | susceptible |
Moneymaker | S. lycopersicum | susceptible | susceptible |
LA4024 | S. lycopersicum | susceptible | susceptible |
LA2133 | S. neorickii | susceptible | susceptible |
LA0735 | S. neorickii | susceptible | susceptible |
LA0716 | S. pennellii | resistant | resistant |
LA1278 | S. peruvianum | susceptible | resistant |
LA1954 | S. peruvianum | resistant | susceptible |
LA1578 | S. pimpinellifolium | susceptible | susceptible |
Regression analysis on the no-choice survival data with generalised linear model for whitefly data; p < 0.05 and Cox proportional hazards coefficients for thrips; p = 0.01, divides the tomato accessions in either “resistant” or “susceptible” environments for the insects. a LA1401 morphotype S. cheesmaniae [25, 53].