Table 5.

Traditional deductive CFIR approach versus rapid deductive CFIR approach: effectiveness and rigor

Domain	Traditional CFIR approach	Rapid CFIR approach
Effectiveness: evaluation objectives
Ability to identify and describe implementation determinants	Yes	Yes
Ability to provide rapid feedback to operational partners	No (preliminary results only)	Yes
Rigor: evaluation processes
Credibility
Analyst authority: We had analysts with expertise in both qualitative methods and the CFIR	Yes	Yes
Data accuracy: We used two analysts/interview and maintained access to the raw data in order to verify the accuracy of data, especially quotations	Yes (transcripts and audio recordings)	Yes (audio recordings)
Data organization: We used matrices, allowing us to parse out and synthesize data as needed	Yes	Yes
Dependability
Data comparability: We used the same interviewers and semi-structured interview guide (based on the CFIR) to ensure data was comparable across participants and facilities	Yes	Yes
Coding comparability: We used the same analysts and framework to ensure coding was comparable across participants and facilities	Yes	Yes
Analysis audit trail: We documented keys phases of analysis and edits in memos and/or matrices	Yes	Yes
Confirmability
Data triangulation: We interviewed multiple participants at each site, allowing us to triangulate data	Yes	Yes
Team reflexivity: We held weekly meetings to discuss discrepancies and refinements to coding processes	Yes	Yes