Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 2;36(6):1293–1307. doi: 10.1002/mds.28599

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the included studies

Study and year Study design Follow up (SD)[range] Participants in group (n) Outcomes Notes
Intervention: all advanced treatments
Dafsari 2019 Prospective, non‐randomized, open‐label multicenter, real‐life cohort study of CSAI, DBS, LCIG 6 mo 39(CSAI)/101 (DBS)/33(LCIG) QoL, adverse events Large group of real‐life cohort study, therefore not comparable groups at baseline
Intervention: DBS original RCTs (additional articles of same RCT)
Deuschl 2006 (Witt 2008, Daniels 2011, Witt 2011) Randomized (paired), controlled, unblinded trial DBS vs. BMT 6 mo 78 (DBS)/78 (BMT) QoL, ADL ON/OFF time, adverse events
Schuepbach 2007 (Lhommee 2018, Schuepbach 2019) Randomized (matched pairs), controlled, unblinded trial (pilot study) 18 mo 10 (DBS)/10 (BMT) QoL, ADL Patients with shorter disease duration with motor fluctuations
Weaver 2009 (Weaver 2012, Rothlind 2015)

Randomized, controlled, multicenter trial

Blinded motor assessment stratification by study site and age

6 mo 121 (DBS)/134 (BMT) ADL, ON/OFF time, adverse events
Williams 2010 Randomized (pairwise), unblinded trial 1 y 183(DBS)/183(BMT) QoL, ADL, OFF time, adverse events Over 1/3 used apomorphine as well, unclear if this was CSAI or injections
Schuepbach 2013 Randomized, controlled, multicenter, unblinded trial 24 mo 124 (DBS)/127 (BMT) QoL, ADL, ON/OFF time, adverse events Patients with shorter disease duration with motor fluctuations
Intervention: LCIG original RCTs (additional articles of same RCT)
Kurth 1993 Double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over study, randomized in six different treatment schemes of LCIG vs. BMT 4 d 10 ON/OFF time LCIG (and placebo) through nasoduodenal tube
Nyholm 2005 (Isacson 2008) Randomized, multicenter, cross‐over trial LCIG vs. BMT 6 wk and 6 mo 25 QoL, ON/OFF time Only 12 patients available for follow‐up data, LCIG through nasoduodenal tube
Olanow 2014 (Antonini 2016) Randomized, multicenter, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial of LCIG vs. BMT 12 wk 37 LCIG(+BMT)/34 placebo (+BMT) QoL, ADL, ON/OFF time Placebo group also had PEG‐J surgery
Intervention: LCIG non‐randomized studies/cohort studies (additional articles of same study)
Antonini 2008 Prospective, before−after, open‐label, multicenter study of LCIG 2 y 22 QoL, ADL, adverse events
Palhagen 2012/Palhagen 2016 Prospective, open‐label, multicenter, cohort study of LCIG 3 y 77 (36 LCIG naïve patients) QoL, ADL, adverse events Large group already treated with LCIG, in our analysis only LCIG naïve population is taken
Fernandez 2013/Fernandez 2015 Prospective, multicenter, before−after, open‐label study of LCIG 54 wk 354 QoL, ADL, ON/OFF time, adverse events Fernandez 2013 is interim analysis, Fernandez 2015 is final analysis
Zibetti 2013 Prospective, open‐label, multicenter, cohort study of LCIG 3 y 25 QoL, ADL, adverse events
Caceres‐Redondo 2014 Prospective, before−after, open‐label study of LCIG 32.2 ± 12.4 mo 29 QoL, ADL, adverse events
Antonini 2015/Antonini 2017 Prospective, multicenter, before−after, open‐label study of LCIG 24 mo 375 (225 prospective cohort) QoL, ADL, ON/OFF time, adverse events Includes retrospective cohort and prospective cohort. We only included the prospective cohort
Bohlega 2015 Prospective, before−after, open‐label study of LCIG 48.5 ± 23.2 mo 20 QoL, adverse events
Martinez‐Martin 2015 Prospective, non‐randomized, comparative, open‐label study CSAI vs. LCIG (data for before−after study of CSAI and LCIG) 6 mo 44 QoL, adverse events Stated as a comparative trial CSAI vs. LCIG, however separate before−after data are presented
Slevin 2015 Open‐label, multicenter, extension study of the RCT (Olanow 2014) of LCIG vs. BMT 52 wk 62 (29 naïve) QoL, ADL, ON/OFF time, adverse events Patients in BMT group of RCT were offered to switch to LCIG and were analyzed in this study as naive LCIG group alongside the continuous LCIG treatment group (and a combined analysis as well)
Catalan 2018 Prospective, multicenter, before−after, open‐label study of LCIG 6 mo 62 ADL, ON/OFF time
Ciurleo 2018 Prospective, before−after, open‐label study of LCIG 6 mo 12 QoL
Vijiaratnam 2018 Prospective, before−after, open‐label study of LCIG 6 mo 25 QoL, ADL, adverse events
Intervention: CSAI RCT
Katzenschlager 2018 Randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, multicenter trial of CSAI vs. BMT 12 wk 53(CSAI)/54(BMT) QoL, ADL, ON/OFF time, adverse events Only RCT with relevant outcomes for our study
Intervention: CSAI non‐randomized studies/cohort studies (additional articles of same study)
Stibe 1988 Prospective, before−after, open‐label study with 2 groups (CSAI and apomorphine injections) 8 mo [1–15] 11 CSAI ON/OFF time In our analysis only CSAI included
Pietz 1998 Prospective, before−after, open‐label study with 2 groups (CSAI and apomorphine injections) 20.2 mo (54.0 mo) 25 CSAI ADL, OFF time In our analysis only CSAI included
Kanovsky 2002 Prospective, before−after, open‐label study 2 y 12 CSAI ON/OFF time, adverse events
Di Rosa 2003/Morgante 2004 Non‐randomized, open‐label, blinded‐rater, parallel‐group trial CSAI vs. BMT 1 y/2 y 12 (CSAI)/18 (BMT) OFF time, adverse events The two articles describe the same study population but different follow‐up. An important exclusion criterion was age above 65 y
Katzenschlager 2005 Prospective, 2 centers before−‐after study, blinded rating of video assessments 6 mo 12 CSAI ON/OFF time, adverse events
De Gaspari 2006/Antonini 2011 Prospective, before−after, open‐label study of CSAI (or DBS patients)

1 y

5 y

12 CSAI OFF time Antonini study not included for analysis as only 2/13 patients reached 5‐y follow‐up
Martinez‐Martin 2011 Non‐randomized, open‐label, parallel group trial CSAI vs. BMT 12.5 mo (11.5 mo) 17 (CSAI)/17 (BMT) QoL No accurate control group, no comparable groups at baseline
Martinez‐Martin 2015 Prospective, non‐randomized, comparative, open‐label study CSAI vs. LCIG (data for before−after study of CSAI and LCIG) 6 mo 43 CSAI QoL, adverse events Stated as a comparative trial CSAI vs. LCIG, however separate before−after data are presented

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; CSAI, continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion; DBS, deep brain stimulation; LCIG, levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel; mo, month; QoL, quality of life; RCT, randomized controlled trial; BMT, best medical treatment; ADL, activities of daily living; mo; months; ON/OFF time: duration of on time and duration of OFF time.