TABLE 1.
Site | Year | n | Dose (ng) | 95% CI a | χ2 b | P‐value | RR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laboratory Colony | 2019 | 288 | 1.04 | 0.5–1.5 | 20.28 | <0.0001 | 1.00 |
Oregon (Umatilla) c | 2019 | 192 | 0.7 | 0.4–1.1 | 43.64 | <0.0001 | 0.67 |
Wisconsin (Dane) d | 2019 | 192 | 2.26 | 1.04–4.44 | 42.93 | <0.0001 | 2.17 |
Wisconsin (Hancock) c | 2019 | 192 | 15.1 | 8.65–25.67 | 36.95 | <0.0001 | 14.52 |
Maine (Aroostook‐1) d | 2019 | 96 | 1.42 | 0.5–3.43 | 23.41 | <0.0001 | 1.37 |
Maine (Aroostook‐2) c | 2019 | 96 | 11.5 | 3.8–24.38 | 12.9 | 0.0003 | 11.06 |
RR resistant ration calculated using the Lab Colony as a reference.
95% confidence interval (CI) estimates around LD50 estimates.
Chi‐square analysis effects of the Proc Probit regression.
Conventional standard pesticide input population.
Organic standard pesticide input population.