Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 7;36(7):975–992. doi: 10.1002/gps.5542

TABLE 2.

Main characteristics of the included studies

Author/year Country Design Children Parents Measures Key results
Gender Mean age (range) Living arrangement Gender Mean age (range) Care setting Diagnosis
Allen et al. (2009) UK Q, CS F 7, M 5 19 (13–24) FH 12 M 7 56 (51–64) H 5, RC 2 AD 3, FTD 2, mixed 1, VD 1 Semi‐structured interview Five themes: damage of dementia; reconfiguration of relationships; strain; caring; coping. Overarching theme: one day at a time
Aslett et al. (2017) UK Q, CS F 3, M 2 31 (23–35) OH 3, FH 2 F 2, M 3 60 (52–65) H 4, RC 1 AD 3, FTD 2 Semi‐structured interview Five themes: changes in relationships with YOD parent; shifts in role and responsibilities; concern for the nonaffected parent; the need for participants to be supported; the personal impact to self of the parental YOD diagnosis
Barca et al. (2014) NO Q, CS F 12, M 2 NS (20‐35) OH 14 F 12, M 2 NS (45– 60+) H 3, RC 11 AD 6, FTD 4, mixed 1, NS 3 Semi‐structured interview Two themes: experiences in social relationships; experiences and needs related to services.
Davies et al. (2000) US MM, CS F 14, M 6 28 (16–34) OH 18, FH 2 20 NS NS H 20 AD 20 Questionnaires: Symptom Checklist‐90 (SCL‐90), Knowledge Questionnaire (KQ), Self‐Control Schedule (SCS); Semi‐structured interview SCL‐90: highest scores on interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety and hostility; KQ: 72% average score of correct answers; SCS: skills for managing adverse life events were in the normal range. Four stages of sequential resolving: awareness, explanation, attribution, integration
Denny et al. (2012) US QT, CS F 17, M 7 NS (18–35) NS F 9, M 14 NS NS FTD 23 Self‐completed online survey Diagnosis: 52.4% unaware of the name of their parent's diagnosis. Most common sources of information: well parent (23.8%), parent and Internet (23.8%), Internet (19.0%). Emotions: sadness, anger, scariness, and confusion. Most supportive activities included being with friends, sports, music, staying busy, video games, and staying away from home. Caregiving: 57.9% provided regular or significant care. Some felt stressed, annoyed, angry, while others responsible, helpful and grown up. Most difficulties: behavior problems, loss of past relationship, cognitive symptoms and caregiving. Impact: increased closeness of family relationships and growth in self‐confidence. Support: 72.2% interested in meeting children or teens with similar experience
Gelman and Rhames (2016) US Q, CS F 5, M 3 18 (15–20) FH 8 M 4 NS H 4 AD 3, FTD 1 Semi‐structured interview Three themes: abrupt interruption/disruption of child's developmental course; adaptation, coping and growth; lack of YOD information and relevant services
Hall & Sikes (2017) US Q, L 22 NS NS (6–31) NS NS NS NS NS Two to three unstructured interviews over 18 months Three themes: the process of narrating dementia; “taboo” subjects; portrayals of dementia by people without dementia
Hall and Sikes (2018) US Q, L F 16, M 4 22 (8−31) OH 11, FH 6, NS 3 F 8, M 10 NS NS FTD 8, VD 2, LB 1, PCA 1, NS 6 Two to three unstructured interviews over 16 months Three themes: something is amiss “you don't normally put three and a half spoons of sugar in your tea”; navigating the pathway; the unpredictability of dementia
Hall and Sikes (2018) US Q, L F 18, M 4 20 (6–31) OH 11, FH 8, NS 3 F 8, M 11 NS NS FTD 8, VD 2, LB 1, PCA 1, NS 7 Up to three unstructured interviews over 12 months. Sessions with children under‐10s involved activities such as “my day,” timelines and family trees Three themes: disruption to existing family practices; continuities; reconceptualization of relationships
Hall and Sikes (2020) US Q, L F 19, M 4 20 (6‐31) OH 11, FH 9, NS 3 F 9, M 13 NS NS NS Up to three unstructured interviews over 12 months. Sessions with children under‐10s involved play, drawing, family tree and ‘my day’ storytelling activities Three themes: constructing the life course; being betwixt and between; managing the betwixt and between.
Hutchinson et al. (2014) AU Q, CS F 11, M 1 24 (19–33) NS F 7, M 5 NS NS NS Semi‐structured interview Four themes: the emotional toll of caring; keeping the family together; grief and loss; psychological distress
Hutchinson et al. (2016) AU Q, CS F 11, M 1 24 (19–33) NS F 7, M 5 NS NS NS Semi‐structured interview Three themes: invisibility; connectivity; being empowered
Johannessen et al. (2015) NO Q, CS F 9, M 5 24 (18–30) OH 11, FH 3 F 5, M 9 NS NS NS Semi‐structured interview Four themes and related metaphors: the development and course of the dementia: “my parent is sliding away”; feelings: “emotional chaos”; the transformed relations: “becoming a parent to my parent”; the provision of public services: “a battle”
Johannessen et al. (2016) NO Q, L F 9, M 5 24 (18–30) T1: OH 11, FH 3; T2: OH 12, FH 1 (dropout 1) F 5, M 9 61 (57–66) T1: H 9, RC 5; T2: H 6, RC 7(dropout 1) NS Two semi‐structured interviews (T2: 1 year later) Two themes: detachment; resilience
Lövenmarck (2019) SE Q, CS 3 NS NS (15–25) NS 3 NS NS NS NS Discourse analysis of blogs written by participants who had grown up/lived with a parent diagnosed with dementia (TOT = 371 posts over 6–9 years) Three themes: parent to your parent(s); orphan with parents; time traveler stuck in time
Millenaar et al. (2014) NE Q,CS F 8, M 6 21 (15–27) FH 14 F 3, M 8 53 (47–62) H 11 AD 5, FTD 4, VD 1, NS 1 Semi‐structured interview Three themes: the impact of dementia on daily life; coping with the disease; the need for care and support
Nichols et al. (2013) US, CA Q, CS F 10, M 4 14 (11–18) FH 14 F 1, M 6 NS H 7 FTD 7 Focus group Seven themes: emotional impact of living with a parent with FTD; caregiving; coping; symptoms of FTD; diagnosis; relationships; support
Sikes and Hall (2016) UK Q, L F 16, M 3 22 (8–31) OH 10, FH 6, NS 3 F 8, M 9 NS NS FTD 7, VD 2, LB 1, PCA 1, NS 6 Unstructured interviews (at least two) One theme: not the same person narratives
Sikes and Hall (2017) UK Q, L F 18, M 4 20 (6–31) OH 11, FH 8, NS 3 F 8, M 11 NS NS AD 7, FTD 8, VD 2, LB 1, PCA 1 Unstructured interviews (at least two) over 18 months. Sessions with children under‐10s involved play, drawing, family tree and “my day” storytelling activities Six themes: diagnosis; ongoing loss; life on hold; missing landmark events; envy; coping or not
Sikes and Hall (2018) UK Q, L 24 NS NS (6–31) NS NS NS NS NS Up to three unstructured interviews over 18 months. Sessions with children under‐10s involved play, drawing, family tree and “my day” storytelling activities Five themes: locating parental dementia with reference to educational milestones; dementia‐specific challenges; education as an escape/coping mechanism; dementia and educational choices; educational institutions' responses
Svanberg et al. (2010) UK MM, CS F 6, M 6 14 (11‐18) NS F 2, M 7 NS H 5, RC 2 (deceased 2) AD 5, FTD 3, VD 1 Questionnaires: Recent Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ), Zarit Burden Interview‐short (ZBI‐short), Resilience Scale (RS); Semistructured interview MFQ: 33% had a mood disorder; ZBI‐short: 58% high levels of burden; RS: 83% moderate levels of resilience. Four themes: discovering dementia; developing a new relationship; learning to live with it; going through it together. Three stages of adaptation: grief, emotional detachment, increased maturity

Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; AU, Australia; CA, Canada; CS, cross‐sectional; F, females; FH, family home; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; H, home; L, longitudinal; LB, Lewy bodies; M, males; MM, mixed methodology; NE, Netherlands; NO, Norway; NS, not specified; OH, own house; PCA, posterior cortical atrophy; Q, qualitative; QT, quantitative; RC, residential care; SE, Sweden; UK, United Kingdom; US, United States; VD, vascular dementia.