Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;106(3):817–830. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15202

Table 4.

CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated gene editing efficiency and types for Vu‐SPO11 in IT86D‐1010

Total # of T0 plants # of T0 edited plants 1 # of T0 edited plants with allele read percentage > 30% 2 # of T0 edited plants with biallelic knockouts 3 # of T0 edited plants with chimeric edits (≥2 edited alleles) # of T0 edited plants with multiple‐bp deletion # of edited T0 plants with 1‐bp G deletion # edited T0 plants with 1‐bp G insertion
35 24 (68.6%) 4 9 (25.7%) 4 2 (5.7%) 4 10 (41.6%) 5 8 (33.3%) 5 17 (70.8%) 5 9 (37.5%) 5
1

Edits are defined as mutagenesis at target site.

2

See Table S12 for the allele read percentage in each plant.

3

Biallelic knockout is defined as targeted mutagenesis that results in a frameshift mutation for both alleles.

4

The number in parentheses represents the frequency of the mutation type in the total T0 plants.

5

The number in parentheses represents the frequency of the mutation type in the total edited plants detected.