Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 18;12:658621. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.658621

TABLE 9.

Wilting accuracy matrix with the number of manual wilting scores (2019) on the visual scale at the left and outside the table and the count of image-derived wilting scores in the table.

Estimated turgid vs. wilted plants

Proximal images Aerial images


Plant water status No of plots within each water status Turgid Wilted No of plots within each water status Turgid Wilted
Turgid 89 82 7 90 86 4
Wilted 78 5 73 78 5 73
Total 167 168
Accuracy 93% 92% 94% 95% 96% 94%

Wilting was on a binary scale of turgid/wilted. The percentage represents the fraction of wilting values that were estimated correctly using logistic model derived in 2018. The 2018 binary models were validated by substituting the RGB color indices values derived in 2019. The proximal and aerial images were taken at 15 weeks after planting.

Wilting score 0 and 1 were rated as turgid and scores above 2 (2 inclusive) were rated as wilted.

Color space indices – Intensity, Hue, Saturation, Lightness, a*, b*, u*, v*, green area (GA), greener area (GGA), crop senescence index (CSI).