Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan 8;79(7):1423–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.01.002

Table 1.

Responses among all providers

Question Response n (%)*
1 2 3 4 5
Discectomy is a useful procedure for managing TMJ-ID 44 (75) 6 (10) 6 (10) 3 (5) 0 (0)
Discectomy is useful as a first surgical option for TMJ-ID 24 (41) 20 (34) 4 (7) 9 (15) 2 (3)
Discectomy is effective for managing TMJ pain 15 (26) 20 (34) 7 (12) 9 (16) 7 (12)
Discectomy is effective for managing TMJ locking 19 (33) 16 (28) 10 (17) 7 (12) 6 (10)
Discectomy is effective if symptoms persist after TMJ arthrocentesis or arthroscopy 11 (19) 15 (26) 13 (22) 10 (17) 9 (16)
After undergoing TMJ discectomy, most patients have good jaw function and pain control in the long term 4 (7) 5 (9) 19 (33) 20 (34) 10 (17)
In the management of disc displacement with reduction, discectomy has better outcomes than arthroscopy or arthrocentesis 18 (32) 14 (25) 13 (23) 6 (11) 6 (11)
In the management of disc displacement without reduction, discectomy has better outcomes than arthroscopy or arthrocentesis 7 (12) 9 (15) 11 (19) 22 (37) 10 (17)
In the management of disc displacement without reduction and degenerative bony changes, discectomy has better outcomes than arthroscopy or arthrocentesis 42 (71) 7 (12) 4 (7) 3 (5) 3 (5)
In the management of disc displacement with reduction, discectomy has better outcomes than disc plication (discopexy) 13 (22) 7 (12) 12 (21) 22 (38) 4 (7)
In the management of disc displacement without reduction, discectomy has better outcomes than disc plication (discopexy) 8 (14) 5 (9) 11 (19) 23 (40) 11 (19)
Discectomy is effective if symptoms persist after disc plication) 7 (12) 5 (9) 10 (17) 27 (47) 9 (16)
It is preferable to avoid discectomy and recommend a modified condylotomy if TMJ symptoms persist after conservative measures (may include non-surgical or minimally invasive surgical options) 7 (12) 7 (12) 11 (19) 25 (42) 9 (15)
An eminectomy should be performed at the time of discectomy 18 (31) 15 (25) 18 (31) 4 (7) 4 (7)
Osteoplasty of the fossa and/or condyle is usually indicated at the time of discectomy 19 (32) 18 (31) 10 (17) 11 (19) 1 (2)
Interpositional tissue is indicated in most cases after discectomy 13 (22) 11 (19) 6 (10) 14 (24) 15 (25)
Interpositional tissue improved pain and function after TMJ discectomy 11 (19) 13 (22) 13 (22) 13 (22) 9 (15)
A fossa-eminence alloplast should be implanted after discectomy 44 (75) 10 (17) 4 (7) 0 (0) 1 (2)
The fossa-eminence alloplast improves pain and function after discectomy 38 (66) 9 (16) 10 (17) 0 (0) 1 (2)
Instead of discectomy, an alloplastic total joint replacement is indicated if TMJ symptoms persist after conservative measures (may include non-surgical or minimally invasive surgical options) 21 (36) 17 (29) 4 (7) 12 (20) 5 (8)
Discectomy is the procedure of choice before considering alloplastic total joint replacement for patients with symptomatic disc displacement without reduction 10 (17) 9 (15) 6 (10) 22 (37) 12 (20)
Discectomy is the procedure of choice if the disc is perforated on arthroscopy/MRI and symptoms persist 10 (17) 5 (8) 5 (8) 22 (37) 17 (29)
Discectomy is the procedure of choice before considering alloplastic total joint replacement for symptomatic patients with late stage TMD-ID and degenerative condylar changes of the TMJ) 16 (27) 13 (22) 6 (10) 16 (27) 8 (14)
An alloplastic total joint replacement is the procedure of choice if the disc is perforated on arthroscopy/MRI and symptoms persist 15 (25) 15 (25) 11 (19) 11 (19) 7 (12)
Most patients who undergo TMJ discectomy need additional surgery such as alloplastic total joint replacement 8 (14) 15 (25) 12 (20) 15 (25) 9 (15)
*

1=Strongly disagree; 2=Somewhat disagree; 3=Neither agree nor disagree; 4=Somewhat agree; 5=Strong agree