Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;34(3):250–261. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.250

Table 5.

Mean and standard deviation values for thermographic according to groups and evaluations

Thermographic Group
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3rd 21.09 ± 1.74 20.23 ± 0.91 22.80 ± 0.82 23.03 ± 0.68 23.66 ± 0.39 24.30 ± 0.41 23.13 ± 1.25
7th 22.24 ± 1.92 21.20 ± 0.88 23.43 ± 0.81 23.98 ± 1.05 24.25 ± 0.63 25.45 ± 0.56 24.39 ± 1.49
14th 22.57 ± 1.25 22.54 ± 0.67 22.49 ± 1.01 22.85 ± 0.70 23.66 ± 0.86 24.45 ± 0.86 24.17 ± 0.55
21st 21.12 ± 0.50 23.22 ± 0.64 21.99 ± 0.85 22.65 ± 1.05 23.00 ± 0.69 21.89 ± 0.35 23.99 ± 0.86

Group 1: control (placebo), Group 2: photobiomodulation (PBM) applied to the paw with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) from the warm phase, Group 3: PBM applied to the paw with CRPS-I from the acute phase, Group 4: PBM applied close to the area of the region between L4 and L5 from the warm phase, Group 5: PBM applied close to the area of the region between L4 and L5 from the acute phase, Group 6: PBM applied at two points: right paw and region between L4 and L5 from the warm phase, Group 7: PBM applied at two points: right paw and region between L4 and L5 from the acute phase, 3rd: third evaluation day, 7th: seventh evaluation day, 14th: fourteenth evaluation day, 21st: twenty-first evaluation day.