Table 4.

Experimental measurement data for the tomographic analysis states to reconstruct the physical density matrix using the MLT. Here, we have used the notation $|D\rangle =(|H\rangle +|V\rangle )/\sqrt{2}$, $|L\rangle =(|H\rangle +i|V\rangle )/\sqrt{2}$ and $|R\rangle =(|H\rangle -|V\rangle )/\sqrt{2}$.

projection modea		wave-plates angle		single count rate [cps]				coincidence count rate [cps]
ν	AB	(hA,qA)	(hB,qB)	RA	ΔRA	RB	ΔRB	$R_c$	ΔRA
1	HH	(45,0)	(45,0)	147948.9	1105.93	153163.1	480.21	393.90	15.28
2	HV	(45,0)	(0,0)	147634.8	709.19	166312.8	609.79	20311.20	154.15
3	VV	(0,0)	(0,0)	192185.9	1093.16	166866.8	935.68	431.10	40.73
4	VH	(0,0)	(45,0)	191927.2	791.79	167524.8	1061.66	20020.70	232.02
5	RH	(22.5,0)	(45,0)	167385.3	864.70	168598.9	678.13	11489.00	184.40
6	RV	(22.5,0)	(0,0)	167324.6	774.44	166527.4	797.42	9051.50	184.44
7	DV	(22.5,45)	(0,0)	168523.2	828.53	167088.7	871.87	11123.50	204.01
8	DH	(22.5,45)	(45,0)	168084.6	1171.37	168071.7	591.91	8941.10	193.73
9	DR	(22.5,45)	(22.5,0)	165216.2	633.79	164677.3	567.47	7956.20	228.51
10	DD	(22.5,45)	(22.5,45)	170360	624.23	165050.3	776.69	716.90	56.21
11	RD	(22.5,0)	(22.5,45)	168862.9	1573.20	165050.3	677.33	9472.30	151.59
12	HD	(45,0)	(22.5,45)	142171.6	890.40	165763	1349.81	10282.60	137.01
13	VD	(0,0)	(22.5,45)	190450.1	1090.98	166000.8	1074.42	8346.60	110.84
14	VL	(0,0)	(22.5,90)	192181.3	1090.04	168922.5	783.59	12727.60	175.61
15	HL	(45,0)	(22.5,90)	146866.6	803.78	169126.4	784.87	7103.00	147.25
16	RL	(22.5,0)	(22.5,90)	166698.1	1194.72	168640.5	1260.55	18817.20	238.57

^aIt must be mentioned that when the measurements are taken, only one wave-plate angle has to be changed between projection measurements. That is reason to choose this set of projection ν-arrangement.