Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 21;8:685868. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.685868

Table 3.

Logistic regression of parameters, which may affect the positive result of peritoneal lavage examination.

Parameter Odds ratio (HR) Confidence interval −95%+95% Standard error p
Location Cardia 0.808 0.207–3.148 0.634 0.758
Body and/or prepyloric region 0.120 0.035–0.412 0.629 <0.001
Entire stomach 19.800 5.188–75.568 0.683 <0.001
Degree of differentiation G1 Assessment not possible – G1 was not present in the fcc (+) group
G2 0.257 0.055–1.208 0.789 0.085
G3 5.000 1.068–23.412 0.788 0.041
Type according to Lauren Intestinal 0.150 0.032–0.700 0.787 0.015
Diffuse 7.042 1.862–26.636 0.679 0.004
Mixed 0.442 0.052–3.690 1.082 0.451
T3/T4 Not determined—all fcc (+) patients had T3/T4 stage
N+ Not determined—all patients from fcc (+) group had N (+) stage
Macroscopically visible peritoneal dissemination 1.932 0.588–6.345 0.607 0.277