Table 3.
Confirmatory factor analyses.
| Model | Factor | λ2 | df | λ2/df | RMSEA | SRMR | TLI | CFI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four-factor Model | AS;PA;C;PIA | 157.284 | 113 | 1.392 | 0.041 | 0.045 | 0.976 | 0.980 |
| Three-factor Model | AS;PA+C;PIA | 282.451 | 116 | 2.435 | 0.078 | 0.054 | 0.914 | 0.926 |
| Three-factor Model | AS+PA;C;PIA | 682.339 | 116 | 5.882 | 0.144 | 0.111 | 0.706 | 0.749 |
| Three-factor Model | AS;PA;C+PIA | 553.465 | 116 | 4.771 | 0.124 | 0.123 | 0.783 | 0.815 |
| Two-factor Model | AS+PA+C;PIA | 803.842 | 118 | 6.812 | 0.158 | 0.115 | 0.650 | 0.696 |
| Two-factor Model | AS;PA+C+PIA | 663.525 | 118 | 5.623 | 0.141 | 0.129 | 0.722 | 0.758 |
| Two-factor Model | AS+PA;C+PIA | 1042.613 | 118 | 8.836 | 0.183 | 0.152 | 0.528 | 0.591 |
| One-factor Model | AS+PA+C+PIA | 1174.610 | 119 | 9.871 | 0.195 | 0.158 | 0.466 | 0.533 |
AS refers to abusive supervision; PA refers to psychological availability; C refers to creativity; PIA refers to performance improvement attribution.