Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 21;12:658743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658743

Table 3.

Confirmatory factor analyses.

Model Factor λ2 df λ2/df RMSEA SRMR TLI CFI
Four-factor Model AS;PA;C;PIA 157.284 113 1.392 0.041 0.045 0.976 0.980
Three-factor Model AS;PA+C;PIA 282.451 116 2.435 0.078 0.054 0.914 0.926
Three-factor Model AS+PA;C;PIA 682.339 116 5.882 0.144 0.111 0.706 0.749
Three-factor Model AS;PA;C+PIA 553.465 116 4.771 0.124 0.123 0.783 0.815
Two-factor Model AS+PA+C;PIA 803.842 118 6.812 0.158 0.115 0.650 0.696
Two-factor Model AS;PA+C+PIA 663.525 118 5.623 0.141 0.129 0.722 0.758
Two-factor Model AS+PA;C+PIA 1042.613 118 8.836 0.183 0.152 0.528 0.591
One-factor Model AS+PA+C+PIA 1174.610 119 9.871 0.195 0.158 0.466 0.533

AS refers to abusive supervision; PA refers to psychological availability; C refers to creativity; PIA refers to performance improvement attribution.