Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 21;12:589506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589506

TABLE 5.

Subgroup mean comparison—clustered by constructs.

ZAREKI-R
HRT 1–4
t-test Cohen’s d BF t-test Cohen’s d BF
Intelligence 2.10* 0.48 1.57 2.65* 0.62 3.48
Reading fluency 1.87 0.43 1.07 1.76 0.43 0.93
Working memory 1.20 0.28 0.44 0.67 0.17 0.31
Basic numerical processing 4.66*** 1.07 1589.59 0.11 0.03 0.25
Complex number processing 6.06*** 1.38 3.28×105 11.00*** 2.73 2.15×1013
Calculation 11.16*** 2.55 3.19×1015 8.32*** 2.06 7.63×108
Attention 3.54*** 0.81 43.98

Interpretation of p-values: p < 0.05*, p < 0.01**, p < 0.001*** the significance level was adjusted by the sequentially rejective Bonferroni test to prevent the alpha error from accumulating (Holm, 1979); interpretation of BFs (Wagenmakers et al., 2018): BF < 0.33 (moderate evidence for the null hypothesis), BF < .10 (strong evidence for the null hypothesis), BF < 0.033 (very strong evidence for the null hypothesis), BF > 3 (moderate evidence for the alternative hypothesis), BF > 10 (strong evidence for the alternative hypothesis), BF > 30 (very strong evidence for the alternative hypothesis).