TABLE 5.
Subgroup mean comparison—clustered by constructs.
ZAREKI-R |
HRT 1–4 |
|||||
t-test | Cohen’s d | BF | t-test | Cohen’s d | BF | |
Intelligence | 2.10* | 0.48 | 1.57 | 2.65* | 0.62 | 3.48 |
Reading fluency | 1.87 | 0.43 | 1.07 | 1.76 | 0.43 | 0.93 |
Working memory | 1.20 | 0.28 | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.17 | 0.31 |
Basic numerical processing | 4.66*** | 1.07 | 1589.59 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.25 |
Complex number processing | 6.06*** | 1.38 | 3.28×105 | 11.00*** | 2.73 | 2.15×1013 |
Calculation | 11.16*** | 2.55 | 3.19×1015 | 8.32*** | 2.06 | 7.63×108 |
Attention | 3.54*** | 0.81 | 43.98 | − | − | − |
Interpretation of p-values: p < 0.05*, p < 0.01**, p < 0.001*** the significance level was adjusted by the sequentially rejective Bonferroni test to prevent the alpha error from accumulating (Holm, 1979); interpretation of BFs (Wagenmakers et al., 2018): BF < 0.33 (moderate evidence for the null hypothesis), BF < .10 (strong evidence for the null hypothesis), BF < 0.033 (very strong evidence for the null hypothesis), BF > 3 (moderate evidence for the alternative hypothesis), BF > 10 (strong evidence for the alternative hypothesis), BF > 30 (very strong evidence for the alternative hypothesis).