Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;18(2):389–396. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142136.068

Table 2.

Comparison of the Neurosurgeon and Orthopedic Surgeon group of responses

Variable All answers (N = 70) Neurosurgeon (N = 21) Orthopedic surgeon (N = 49) p-value
Total no. of NASS-discordant answers 4.93 ± 2.01 4.62 ± 1.85 5.06 ± 2.07 0.403
Fellowship training 68 (97.1) 20 (95.2) 48 (97.9) 0.513
Years in practice
0–5 28 (40) 6 (28.6) 22 (44.9) 0.288
6–10 14 (20) 4 (19) 10 (20.4) 1.000
11–15 9 (13) 4 (19) 5 (10.2) 0.437
16–20 7 (10) 6 (28.6) 1 (20.4) < 0.01*
> 20 12 (17.1) 1 (4.7) 11 (22.4) 0.09
Approach to indicate lumbar fusion
I do not use a specific criteria 5 (7.1) 1 (4.8) 4 (8.2) 1.000
I consider the evidence-based NASS criteria in my evaluation 42 (60) 13 (61.9) 29 (59.2) 0.831
I use another criteria 9 (12.9) 4 (19) 5 (10.2) 0.259
My indication is only based on my clinical experience 14 (20) 3 (14.3) 11 (22.4) 0.529
Region
South 20 (28.6) 6 (28.6) 14 (28.6) 1.000
Northeast 19 (27.1) 5 (23.8) 14 (28.6) 0.776
Midwest 16 (22.9) 4 (19) 12 (24.5) 0.761
West 9 (12.9) 3 (14.3) 6 (12.2) 1.000
Canada 6 (8.6) 3 (14.3) 3 (6.1) 0.355
NASS-concordant approach (≥ 70% of NASS-concordant answers) 44 (62.8) 14 (66.7) 30 (61.23) 0.79

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

NASS, North America Spine Society.

*

p < 0.05, statistically significant difference.

Fisher exact test, t-test, or Mann-Whitney test, comparing the group of Neurosurgeons with Orthopedic Surgeons.