Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;18(2):389–396. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142136.068

Table 3.

Comparison between the respondents who stated that consider the NASS criteria in their lumbar fusion indication algorithm and the respondents who do not consider

Variable All answers (N = 70) Consider NASS (N = 42) Do not consider (N = 28) p-value
Total no. of NASS-discordant answers 4.93 ± 2.01 5.10 ± 1.96 4.68 ± 2.09 0.395
Fellowship training 68 (97.1) 41 (97.6) 27 (96.4) 1.000
Years in practice 0.212
 0–5 28 (40) 15 (35.7) 13 (46.4) 0.457
 6–10 14 (20) 11 (26.2) 3 (10.7) 0.138
 11–15 91 (12.9) 4 (9.5) 5 (17.8) 0.468
 16–20 7 (10) 6 (14.3) 1 (3.5) 0.23
 > 20 12 (17.1) 6 (14.3) 6 (21.4) 0.524
Region
 South 20 (28.6) 13 (30.9) 7 (25) 0.788
 Northeast 19 (27.2) 12 (28.6) 7 (25) 0.79
 Midwest 16 (22.9) 7 (16.7) 9 (32.1) 0.155
 West 9 (12.9) 7 (16.7) 2 (7.1) 0.299
 Canada 6 (8.6) 3 (7.1) 3 (10.7) 0.677
NASS-concordant approach (> = 70% of NASS-concordant answers) 44 (62.9) 25 (59.5) 19 (67.9) 0.615

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

NASS, North America Spine Society.

Fisher exact test, t-test, or Mann-Whitney test, comparing the group who consider the NASS criteria with the group who do not consider.