Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 27;149(3):615–626. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33581

Table 3.

Association between dietary inflammatory index, dietary oxidative balance score, and risk of breast cancer

Index score quartiles P for trend Continuous 1 SD increment
Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
Person-years 92605 92278 91571 89960 366414
Dietary inflammatory index Total breast cancer No. of cases 692 663 648 616 2619
Model 1, HR (95%CI)1 1 (ref) 0.99 (0.88–1.10) 1.01 (0.90–1.12) 1.02 (0.91–1.14) 0.37 1.00 (0.96–1.05)
Model 2, HR (95%CI)2 1 (ref) 0.98 (0.88–1.09) 0.99 (0.89–1.11) 1.01 (0.90–1.13) 0.80 1.00 (0.96–1.04)
ER+ breast cancer No. of cases 534 509 497 421 1961
Model 1, HR (95%CI)1 1 (ref) 0.99 (0.87–1.11) 1.01 (0.89–1.14) 0.91 (0.80–1.04) 0.60 0.96 (0.92–1.01)
Model 2, HR (95%CI)2 1 (ref) 0.98 (0.87–1.11) 1.00 (0.89–1.14) 0.93 (0.81–1.07) 0.64 0.97 (0.92–1.02)
ER − breast cancer No. of cases 78 88 77 88 331
Model 1, HR (95%CI)1 1 (ref) 1.15 (0.84–1.56) 1.03 (0.75–1.42) 1.24 (0.90–1.71)* 0.37 1.07 (0.96–1.19)
Model 2, HR (95%CI)2 1 (ref) 1.15 (0.85–1.56) 1.05 (0.76–1.44) 1.30 (0.94–1.79)* 0.30 1.09 (0.97–1.22)
Triple − breast cancer No. of cases 39 44 44 55 182
Model 1, HR (95%CI)1 1 (ref) 1.14 (0.74–1.75) 1.17 (0.75–1.80) 1.49 (0.97–2.30) 0.27 1.17 (1.02–1.35)
Model 2, HR (95%CI)2 1 (ref) 1.14 (0.74–1.75) 1.17 (0.76–1.80) 1.53 (0.99–2.35) 0.26 1.18 (1.03–1.36)
Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
Person-years 87843 96201 90774 91596 366414
Dietary oxidative balance score Total breast cancer No. of cases 611 677 666 665 2619
Model 1, HR (95%CI)1 1 (ref) 0.96 (0.86–1.07) 0.97 (0.87–1.08) 0.91 (0.81–1.03) 0.23 0.97 (0.93–1.01)
Model 2, HR (95%CI)2 1 (ref) 0.96 (0.86–1.07) 0.97 (0.86–1.08) 0.92 (0.81–1.03) 0.23 0.97 (0.93–1.01)
ER+ breast cancer No. of cases 428 516 511 506 1961
Model 1, HR (95%CI)1 1 (ref) 1.05 (0.92–1.19) 1.06 (0.93–1.21) 0.99 (0.86–1.13) 0.68 0.99 (0.95–1.04)
Model 2, HR (95%CI)2 1 (ref) 1.03 (0.90–1.17) 1.03 (0.90–1.18) 0.96 (0.83–1.10) 0.98 0.98 (0.94–1.03)
ER − breast cancer No. of cases 82 77 85 87 331
Model 1, HR (95%CI)1 1 (ref) 0.83 (0.60–1.14) 0.95 (0.70–1.30) 0.95 (0.69–1.31) 0.54 0.99 (0.88–1.11)
Model 2, HR (95%CI)2 1 (ref) 0.82 (0.60–1.12) 0.93 (0.68–1.27) 0.93 (0.67–1.28) 0.43 0.98 (0.87–1.09)
Triple − breast cancer No. of cases 51 46 44 41 182
Model 1, HR (95%CI)1 1 (ref) 0.81 (0.54–1.21) 0.81 (0.54–1.23) 0.74 (0.48–1.15) 0.16 0.88 (0.76–1.02)
Model 2, HR (95%CI)2 1 (ref) 0.81 (0.54–1.21) 0.81 (0.54–1.22) 0.74 (0.48–1.15) 0.15 0.88 (0.76–1.02)
1

Adjusted for age (age as the primary time scale)

2

Adjusted for race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or other than White or Black), educational attainment (high school degree or less, some college, or college degree or higher), baseline menopausal status (binary), body mass index (BMI, continuous), interaction term between baseline menopausal status and BMI, physical activity (MET-hours/week, quintiles), smoking status (≥20 pack-years, <20 and ≥10 pack-years, <10 and >0 pack-years, or never smoker), ever use of hormonal birth control, hormone therapy (none, estrogen only, or both estrogen and progesterone), recent mammogram screening (<1, 1–2, or > 2 years or never had a mammogram), number of first-degree relatives diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 years (0, 1, or ≥2), use of aspirin (never, tertiles of lifetime cumulative doses, or missing), and use of non-aspirin NSAIDS (never, tertiles of lifetime cumulative doses, or missing).

*

HR for ER– breast cancer was significantly different from ER+ breast cancer in case–case analysis (P<0.05).

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; +, positive; −, negative.