Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 24;36(3):476–489. doi: 10.1007/s12250-020-00316-0

Table 1.

Evaluation of the primary HTS selected compounds.

Compounds IC50 μmol/L CC50 μmol/L
Homoharringtonine 0.19 50.66
Bruceine D 0.36 25.66
Cucurbitacin B 0.26 15.66
Dihydroartemisinin 0.47 > 100
Digitonin 0.62 > 100
Plumbagin 0.41 12.56
Schizandrin A 0.42 21.53
Dihydrochelerythrine 0.49 > 100
Betulonic acid 0.52 44.54
Artesunate 0.57 > 100
Sodium aescinate 0.69 > 100
Escin 0.76 > 100
Oleanonic acid 1.99 32.61
Cepharanthine 2.25 29.85
Corosolic acid 2.62 9.99
Bergamotine 2.98 23.76
Harringtonine 3.02 21.34
Schisanhenol 3.02 21.34
Fangchinoline 3.78 38.58
Fangchinoline 4.39 40.10
Dihydroactinidiolide 4.66 > 100
Schizandrin B 6.00 41.18
Tetrandrine 6.37 19.35
Liriope muscari baily saponins C 7.78 28.32
Ophiopogonin D 7.78 28.32
Saikosaponin A 9.22 27.72
Berbamine dihydrochloride 9.79 40.32
Daurisoline 10.13 29.28
Reserpine 10.20 33.33
Curcumin 11.23 > 100
Magnolol 31.37 > 100

After primary HTS, 31 compounds were selected for follow-up analysis. Each compound was used to pre-treat cells at concentrations of 0.1 μmol/L, 0.25 μmol/L, 0.5 μmol/L, 1 μmol/L, 2 μmol/L, 4 μmol/L, 10 μmol/L and 100 μmol/L. The vehicle was used as negative control. After 48 h of infection, cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst. Then the plates were scanned by using a high-content-screening microplate imaging reader. Fifty nine fields per well were scanned using 20× objective and analysed for percentage of infection and cell number. The infection positive cell rates and total cell counts were all normalized to that of vehicle control wells.