Table 2. A comparison of the clinical benefits and drawbacks between SEEG and SDE implantation.
SEEG | SDE | |
---|---|---|
Safety | -Lower rates of infection, hemorrhage, neurological deficits, and morbidity | -Increased rates of infection, hemorrhage, neurological deficits, and morbidity |
Invasiveness | -Faster procedure -Lower hospital length of stay -Simple electrode removal |
-SDE commits patients to two craniotomies |
Versatility | -Bilateral hemisphere investigations -Analysis of deeper cerebral tissue -Can record nearly every cerebral structure -Useful for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, insular epilepsy, hypothalamic hamartoma |
-Lacks the extensiveness and scope of SEEG |
Efficacy | -Higher rates of seizure control than SDE | -Lower rates of seizure control that SEEG |
SEEG: stereoelectroencephalography, SDE: subdural electrode.