Table 7.
Regression analysis of inbreeding on the economic traits of IMCGs.
| Effects | LBW | CY | FL | FD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimates | P-value | Estimates | P-value | Estimates | P-value | Estimates | P-value | |
| Intercept | 34.92 | < 0.01** | 660.93 | < 0.01** | 5.899 | < 0.01** | 14.070 | < 0.01** |
| Year | 0.49 | < 0.01** | 13.22 | < 0.01** | 0.050 | < 0.01** | 0.067 | < 0.01** |
| Herd | −0.12 | < 0.01** | 0.89 | 0.027* | −0.017 | < 0.01** | −0.046 | < 0.01** |
| Age | 3.04 | < 0.01** | 4.96 | < 0.01** | 0.019 | < 0.01** | 0.136 | < 0.01** |
| Dage | 0.11 | < 0.01** | −4.13 | < 0.01** | −0.018 | < 0.01** | 0.012 | 0.013* |
| bt | −0.54 | < 0.01** | 10.64 | < 0.01** | 0.018 | 0.069ns | −0.009 | 0.591ns |
| Sex | −14.65 | < 0.01** | −58.20 | < 0.01** | −0.378 | < 0.01** | −0.203 | < 0.01** |
| F | 3.88 | < 0.01** | 208.73 | < 0.01** | 0.151 | 0.178ns | −0.819 | < 0.01** |
age, individual ages; dage, age of dams; bt, birth type; LBW, live body weight; CY, cashmere yield; FL, fiber length; FD, fiber diameter.
highy signifficant;
signifficant; ns, not signifficant.