Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 22;12:649582. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.649582

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of conidiation and transcript of sporulation-related genes between the WT and mutants. (A) Comparison of conidiophore and sporulation the WT and mutants on CMY medium. White arrows: conidium; Bar = 10 μm. (B) Conidial yields in the WT vs. ΔAoBck1 and ΔAoMkk1 mutants. Three asterisks: very significant difference between mutant and the WT (p < 0.001). (C) Relative transcript levels (RTLs) of selected genes involved in conidiation of the WT and ΔAoBck1 mutants at different time points. (D) RTLs of selected genes involved in conidiation of the WT and ΔAoMkk1 mutants at different time points. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the mutants and the WT strain (p < 0.05). CK under given conditions, using CK with an RTL of 1 as the standard, statistical analysis was performed on the RTL of each gene in each mutant and the WT strain. An asterisk indicates a significant difference compared to the WT (p < 0.05).