Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 22;9(1):13–37. doi: 10.1177/2050640620951905

TABLE 1.

Summary of UEG/EMCG statements and recommendations for MC

Section and number Statement/recommendation Level of evidence Grade of recommendation Voting
Section 1 Epidemiology and risk factors
Section 1.1 The pooled overall incidence rate of MC is estimated to be 11.4 (95% CI: 9.2–13.6) cases per 100,000 person‐years. The incidence of CC and LC ranges from 0.6 to 16.4 cases per 100,000 person‐years and from 0.6 to 16.0 cases per 100,000 person‐years, respectively. High NA 100%
Section 1.2 The pooled overall prevalence of MC is estimated to be 119 (95% CI: 73–66) per 100,000 persons, with an overall prevalence of 50.1 per 100,000 person‐year for CC and 61.7 per 100,000 persons for LC. High NA 94%
Section 1.3 The pooled frequency of MC in patients with chronic watery diarrhoea is 12.8% (95% CI: 10–16), with significant heterogeneity (I 2  = 93.6%). Moderate NA 100%
Section 1.4 Former, but especially current smoking is associated with an increased risk of both CC and LC. Moderate NA 100%
Section 1.5 The risk of developing CC or LC is higher in women than in men. High NA 100%
Section 1.6 There is insufficient evidence to evaluate the influence of smoking cessation on the disease course. Low NA 78%
Section 1.7 Chronic or frequent use of PPI, NSAID or SSRI is associated with an increased risk of MC. However, this does not imply a causal relationship. Low NA 94%
Section 1.8 We suggest to consider withdrawal of any drugs with a suspected chronological relationship between drug introduction and onset of diarrhoea. Very low Weak in favour 97%
Section 1.9 MC does not increase the risk of colorectal cancer or adenoma. A special surveillance colonoscopy program is not recommended. Low Strong in favour 100%
Section 2 Pathogenesis
Section 2.1 Pathogenesis of MC is complex and multifactorial. It may include luminal factors, immune dysregulation and genetic predisposition. Low NA 100%
Section 3 Clinical manifestation
Section 3.1 The most common symptom of MC is chronic watery, nonbloody diarrhoea, which is frequently associated with concomitant symptoms including faecal urgency, nocturnal stools and faecal incontinence. nocturnal stools and faecal incontinence. Moderate NA 97%
Section 3.2 MC diagnosis should be ruled out in patients fulfilling the criteria for functional bowel disease, especially in presence of MC risk factors and/or in absence of IBS‐therapy response. Moderate NA 93%
Section 3.3 Health‐related quality of life is impaired in patients with MC, depending on the activity and severity of the disease and concomitant comorbidities. Moderate NA 100%
Section and number Statement/recommendation Level of evidence Grade of recommendation Voting
Section 3.4 In the absence of a formally validated metric of disease activity, disease activity and clinical remission in MC should be assessed by the Hjortswang criteria (clinical remission: mean of <3 stools/day and a mean <1 water stool/day during a 1‐week registration). Moderate NA 100%
Section 4 Diagnosis
Section 4.1 Endoscopic findings are recognised with increased frequency in patients with MC, however they are nonspecific. Low NA 95%
Section 4.2 The histopathologic criteria of CC are a thickened subepithelial collagenous band ≥10 μm combined with an increased inflammatory infiltrate in lamina propria. The criteria apply to haematoxylin and eosin‐stained slides. Moderate NA 89%
Section 4.3 The histopathologic criteria of LC are an increased number of intraepithelial lymphocytes ≥20 per 100 surface epithelial cells combined with an increased inflammatory infiltrate in lamina propria and a not significantly thickened collagenous band (<10 μm). The criteria apply to haematoxylin and eosin‐stained slides. Moderate NA 100%
Section 4.4 Incomplete MC comprises incomplete CC (defined by a thickened subepithelial collagenous band >5 μm but <10 μm) and incomplete LC (defined by >10 IELs but <20 IELs and a normal collagenous band). Both types show a mild inflammatory infiltrate in the lamina propria. The criteria apply to haematoxylin and eosin‐stained slides. Low NA 95%
Section 4.5 We recommend ileocolonoscopy with biopsies from at least the right and left colon. High Strong in favour 100%
Section 4.6 We recommend against histological monitoring in patients with MC. Very low Strong in favour 100%
Section 4.7 Faecal calprotectin is not useful to exclude or monitor MC. Moderate NA 100%
Section 4.8 We recommend screening for coeliac disease in patients with MC. High Strong in favour 100%
Section 4.9 Testing for bile acid diarrhoea is not part of routine diagnostic workup in MC. Low NA 83%
Section 4.10 Testing for bile acid diarrhoea can be considered in patients who experience nonresponse to budesonide treatment. Low Strong in favour 82%
Section 5 Treatment
Section 5.1.1 We recommend using oral budesonide to induce remission in patients with CC. Moderate Strong in favour 100%
Section 5.1.2 We recommend using oral budesonide to induce remission in patients with LC. Low Strong in favour 100%
Section 5.2.1 Oral budesonide is effective to maintain remission in patients with CC. Moderate Strong in favour 94%
Section 5.2.2 We suggest using oral budesonide to maintain remission in patients with LC. Very low Weak in favour 84%
Section 5.3.1 There is no increased risk of serious adverse events with budesonide in MC. Low NA 100%
Section 5.3.2 The risk of osteoporotic bone fractures seems not be increased in budesonide treated MC patients, although prolonged use might be associated with a decrease of bone mineral density. Low NA 97%
Section 5.4 We recommend against treatment with mesalazine in patients with MC for induction of remission. There are no studies for maintenance. Low Strong against 94%
Section 5.5 There is not enough evidence to recommend bismuth subsalicylate in patients with MC. Very low Strong against 92%
Section 5.6 There is not enough evidence to recommend the use of loperamide in MC. Given the documented effect in patients with chronic diarrhoea, the expert's opinion favours the use of this drug in mild disease. Very low Strong in favour 100%
Section 5.7 In patients with MC and bile acid diarrhoea we suggest treatment with bile acid binders. Very low Weak in favour 100%
Section 5.8 There is not enough evidence to recommend antibiotics for treatment of MC. Very low Strong against 100%
Section 5.9 We recommend against use of probiotics for treatment of MC. Low Strong against 100%
Section 5.10 We recommend against the use of prednisolone or other corticoste roids than budesonide for the treatment of MC. Low Strong against 100%
Section 5.11 We recommend treatment with thiopurines, anti‐TNF drugs or vedolizumab in selected patients with MC who fail to respond to budesonide to induce and maintain clinical remission. We recommend against the use of methotrexate in patients with MC. Low Strong in favour 97%
Section 5.12 Surgery can be considered in selected MC patients as last option if all medical therapy fails. Very low Weak in favour 100%

Abbreviations: CC, collagenous colitis; CI, confidence interval; EMCG, European Microscopic Colitis Group; LC, lymphocytic colitis; IELs, intraepithelial lymphocytes; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; MC, microscopic colitis; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; NA, not applicable; UEG, United European Gastroenterology.