Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;76:105655. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105655

Table 3.

Functional properties of untreated and US-treated resistant starch from lotus stem.

Sample RS URS1 URS2 URS3 URS4
US power 100 W 200 W 300 W 400 W



WAC (g/g) 0.50 ± 0.76a 1.23 ± 0.98b 2.11 ± 1.89c 2.87 ± 0.43c 3.53 ± 1.12d
OAC (g/g) 0.22 ± 0.76a 1.09 ± 0.23b 1.79 ± 1.29b 2.87 ± 0.55c 2.93 ± 0.24c



Freeze thaw stability (%)
0 thaw 3.18 ± 0.12c 2.87 ± 0.87b 1.98 ± 0.86a 1.26 ± 1.34a 1.09 ± 0.45a
1 thaw 4.12 ± 1.98c 2.99 ± 0.12b 2.50 ± 0.28b 1.76 ± 0.54a 1.34 ± 0.78a
2 thaw 10.76 ± 1.07c 5.16 ± 1.90b 4.07 ± 0.57a 5.21 ± 0.89b 4.54 ± 1.09a
3 thaw 13.09 ± 0.54c 10.78 ± 0.23a 11.76 ± 0.19b 12.35 ± 0.92b 10.65 ± 0.65a
4 thaw 19.10 ± 0.32d 17.89 ± 0.35c 15.49 ± 1.23b 13.07 ± 1.23a 13.75 ± 1.23a
5 thaw 23.10 ± 1.10d 20.76 ± 1.29c 19.23 ± 1.11b 17.22 ± 0.24a 16.43 ± 0.85a

Where WAC is the water absorption capacity; OAC is the oil absorption capacity; US is ultrasonication; URS1, URS2, URS3 and URS4 represent the resistant starch ultrasonicated at 100, 200, 300 and 400 W. The results are the means of three replications ± standard deviations. Means in the row with different superscript differ significantly (p > 0.05).