Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Physiol. 2021 Jun 8;599(13):3295–3312. doi: 10.1113/JP281225

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Waveform of dim-flash responses. The rod and cone waveforms y^(t)= y(t)ypeak from Fig. 1 (thin continuous lines) were used to compute an averaged waveform (thick continuous lines). The averaged waveform is compared to the analytic result y^(t)=g^y(t) computed with Eq. 9 and parameters from Table 2 (green lines). (A) Waveforms for rod WT (black curves) and GCAPs−/− data (red curves) together with the corresponding analytic results (green curves). (B) Waveforms for cone WT (black curves) and GCAPs−/− data (red curves) together with the corresponding analytic results (green curves).