Skip to main content
. 2021 May 8;16(5):705–716. doi: 10.2215/CJN.16751020

Table 3.

Effects of apabetalone versus placebo on primary and secondary outcomes across CKD

Variable eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 Interaction P Value a
Placebo Event/n (%) Apabetalone Event/n (%) Adjusted HR (95% CI) Placebo Event/n (%) Apabetalone Event/n (%) Adjusted HR (95% CI)
Primary outcome
 MACE 35/164 (21) 13/124 (11) 0.50 (0.26 to 0.96) 114/1041 (11) 112/1084 (10) 0.96 (0.74 to 1.24) 0.03
Composite events
 MACE and CHF 41/164 (25) 16/124 (13) 0.48 (0.26 to 0.88) 132/1041 (13) 123/1084 (11) 0.91 (0.71 to 1.17) 0.03
Components
 CV death 17/164 (10) 6/124 (5) 0.47 (0.18 to 1.24) 38/1041 (4) 39/1084 (4) 1.02 (0.98 to 1.60) 0.12
 Nonfatal MI 20/164 (12) 9/124 (7) 0.59 (0.26 to 1.33) 74/1041 (7) 68/1084 (6) 0.89 (0.64 to 1.24) 0.26
 Nonfatal stroke 6/164 (4) 2/124 (2) 0.57 (0.11 to 2.97) 11/1041 (1) 15/1084 (1) 1.36 (0.62 to 2.96) 0.20
 CHF hospitalization 14/164 (9) 3/124 (2) 0.25 (0.07 to 0.92) 34/1041 (3) 26/1084 (2) 0.76 (0.46 to 1.27) 0.12

Shown are events and total subjects counts, percentage rates, HRs, and 95% CIs for indicated composite and component end points. All analyses are stratified for statin and country and adjusted for age and sex. See also Supplemental Table 1 for minimally adjusted HRs. HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; CHF, congestive heart failure; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction.

a

Interaction P values indicate differences by CKD status in the effect of apabetalone on event rates.