Table 1.
Figure | Normality | Test used | p value | Power |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fig. 1E | Yes | One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc | 1.000 | 0.772 |
0.091 | ||||
0.016 | ||||
0.689 | ||||
Fig. 2H | Yes | Two-sample t test | 0.621 | 0.075 |
0.391 | 0.129 | |||
<0.005 | 1.000 | |||
0.418 | 0.120 | |||
0.027 | 0.645 | |||
0.003 | 0.947 | |||
Fig. 2I | Yes | Two-sample t test | 0.021 | 0.658 |
0.012 | 0.779 | |||
0.083 | 0.414 | |||
0.012 | 0.778 | |||
0.009 | 0.815 | |||
0.143 | 0.303 | |||
Fig. 3D | No | Two-sample t test | 0.06 | 0.433 |
0.06 | 0.403 | |||
Fig. 3E | No | Two-sample t test | 0.01 | 0.928 |
0.14 | 0.348 | |||
Fig. 3F | No | Two-sample t test | 0.20 | 0.239 |
0.10 | 0.355 | |||
Fig. 3G | Yes | One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc | 0.004 | 0.0917 |
0.01 | ||||
Fig. 3I | No | Two-sample t test | 0.07 | 0.199 |
0.02 | 0.466 | |||
0.03 | 0.238 | |||
<0.005 | 0.363 | |||
<0.005 | 0.482 | |||
0.04 | 0.271 | |||
Fig. 3J | No | Two-sample t test | <0.005 | 0.509 |
<0.005 | 0.630 | |||
<0.005 | 0.552 | |||
0.002 | 0.457 | |||
>0.05 | 0.145 | |||
>0.05 | 0.086 | |||
Fig. 3K | Yes | Two-sample t test | 0.15 | 0.290 |
0.45 | 0.113 | |||
Fig. 3L | Yes | Two-sample t test | 0.30 | 0.174 |
0.01 | 0.683 | |||
Fig. 3M | Yes | Two-sample t test | 0.07 | 0.447 |
>0.05 | 0.380 | |||
Extended Data Fig. 3-2H | Yes | Two-sample t test | 0.50 | |
0.47 | ||||
4A | Yes | Two-sample t test | <0.005 | 0.999 |
<0.005 | 1 | |||
Fig. 4B | Yes | Two-sample t test | 0.96 | 0.050 |
0.13 | 0.321 | |||
Fig. 4D | Yes | Two-sample t test | 0.92 | 0.051 |
Extended Data Fig. 4-2A | Yes | One-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey | 0.602 | 0.346 |
0.606 | ||||
6A | Yes | Two-sample t test | 0.02 | 0.692 |
0.17 | 0.268 | |||
7B | Yes | One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc | 1.0 | 1 |
<0.005 | ||||
<0.005 | ||||
<0.005 | ||||
<0.005 | ||||
<0.005 | ||||
0.74 | ||||
1.0 | ||||
0.01 | ||||
0.18 |