Table 1.
Exosome Isolation Technique | Principle | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Differential ultracentrifugation | Density | Requires a small volume of reagents Suitable for large volumes |
Labor intensive Time consuming Large expensive equipment Not suitable for small volume samples Exosome rupture/aggregation |
(74, 75) |
Density gradient ultracentrifugation | Density | Separates different EV subgroups Less exosome rupture/aggregation Requires a small volume of reagents Suitable for large volumes |
Labor intensive Time consuming Large expensive equipment Not suitable for small volume samples |
(76, 77) |
Ultrafiltration | SizeMolecular weight | No large, expensive equipment Relatively fast |
Filter pore clogging Moderate purity Exosome deformation |
(78, 79, 80) |
Size-exclusion chromatography | Size | Exosome structure and function are preserved Relatively fast Requires few reagents High Purity Little sample loss |
Lipoprotein coisolation | (78, 81) |
Immunoaffinity | Exosome surface markers | High exosome yieldHigh purity | Antigen masking Exosome damage |
(82, 83) |
Polymer precipitation | Precipitation | No large, expensive equipment Exosome structure and function are preserved |
Coisolation of EV, proteins, and lipoproteins Exosome aggregation |
(66, 84) |
EV, extracellular vesicles.