Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 6;11:13925. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93088-w

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of the MSTD performance with four state-of-the-art spike sorting algorithms. Results are obtained using the synthesized dataset. (a) Illustration of the SSI metric. It considers both detection and clustering outputs integrated into a single value. (b) Comparison of the proposed fully automatic spike sorting algorithm with four state-of-the-art algorithms employing SSI. The shaded area is the standard error. The proposed MSTD algorithm outperforms all other compared algorithms considering both detection and clustering performances, simultaneously. Only for SNRs lower than 5 dB, GMM has a better performance than the proposed algorithm. (c) The effect of miss detection, false alarm, and clustering performance on SSI. The MSTD algorithm has the lowest performance in terms of miss detection. (d) CA-CA plot between MSTD and the Bayes optimal classifier to investigate the robustness of the proposed method. The R-squared of the fitted line with the least square method is 0.98.