Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 6;8:167. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00946-3

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

An overview of the algorithms (all labels) evaluated on top: excellent quality SR volumes; middle: good quality SR volumes; and bottom: poor quality SR volumes, as well as the ranking for each of the quality levels. The poor-quality SR volumes have worse metrics (lower DSC and VS, higher HD95) than the average and excellent quality SR volumes, and the standard deviations are larger for every label. The difference in metrics between the average and excellent quality metrics is not noticeable.