Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;38(14):1953–1960. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7072

Table 3.

Longitudinal Models of the Association between Biomarker Levels and Randomized Treatment Assignment

Biomarker Percent change in biomarker level 95% CI p value
S100B        
Interaction between time and treatment       0.3228
24 h vs. baseline        
  Progesterone –81.7 –83.5 –79.7 <0.0001
  Placebo –79.6 –81.6 –77.4 <0.0001
48 h vs. baseline        
  Progesterone –89.8 –91.1 –88.3 <0.0001
  Placebo –88.4 –89.9 –86.7 <0.0001
GFAP        
Interaction between time and treatment       0.1558
24 h vs. baseline        
  Progesterone 22.8 7.3 40.5 0.0029
  Placebo 43.6 25.5 64.4 <0.0001
48 h vs. baseline        
  Progesterone –40.5 –48.5 –31.4 <0.0001
  Placebo –27.5 –37.2 –16.3 <0.0001
UCH-L1        
Interaction between time and treatment       0.2125
24 h vs. baseline        
  Progesterone –88.9 –89.9 –87.8 <0.0001
  Placebo –88.4 –89.4 –87.3 <0.0001
48 h vs. baseline        
  Progesterone –95.5 –96.1 –95.0 <0.0001
  Placebo –94.8 –95.4 –94.1 <0.0001
SBDP150        
Interaction between time and treatment       0.2903
24 h vs. baseline        
  Progesterone –65.6 –68.6 –62.4 <0.0001
  Placebo –65.9 –68.8 –62.7 <0.0001
48 h vs. baseline        
  Progesterone –72.1 –74.9 –69.0 <0.0001
  Placebo –70.1 –73.1 –66.7 <0.0001

The models adjusted for age, head CT results based on the Rotterdam Head CT classification, and injury severity based on GCS.

S100B, S100 calcium-binding protein B; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; UCH-L1, ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1; SBDP150, Alpha II Spectrin Breakdown Product 150; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale.