Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 23;8:683250. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.683250

Table 4.

Performance of serum lipids and combination panel with serum adiponectin in the differential diagnosis of NAFL vs. NASH.

Cutoff AUROC (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Accuracy (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) TP TN FP FN
TG(44:0) >0.25 0.72* (0.65–0.79) 0.60 (0.49–0.70) 0.75 (0.65–0.83) 0.67 (0.60–0.74) 0.70 (0.61–0.77) 0.65 (0.59–0.71) 54 68 23 36
TG(49:2) >0.71 0.70* (0.63–0.78) 0.71 (0.61–0.80) 0.58 (0.47–0.69) 0.65 (0.57–0.72) 0.63 (0.56–0.69) 0.67 (0.59–0.75) 64 53 38 26
TG(51:3) >1.02 0.61* (0.54–0.69) 0.61 (0.50–0.71) 0.56 (0.45–0.66) 0.59 (0.51–0.66) 0.58 (0.51–0.65) 0.59 (0.52–0.67) 55 51 40 35
TG(52:1) >0.85 0.75** (0.68–0.82) 0.79 (0.69–0.87) 0.59 (0.49–0.70) 0.69 (0.62–0.76) 0.66 (0.59–0.72) 0.74 (0.65–0.81) 71 54 37 19
TG(53:1) >0.48 0.74* (0.67–0.81) 0.89 (0.81–0.95) 0.49 (0.39–0.60) 0.69 (0.62–0.76) 0.63 (0.58–0.68) 0.82 (0.71–0.89) 80 45 46 10
TG(54:0) >0.38 0.68* (0.61–0.76) 0.72 (0.62–0.81) 0.57 (0.46–0.67) 0.65 (0.57–0.72) 0.63 (0.56–0.69) 0.68 (0.59–0.75) 65 52 39 25
TG(60:3) >0.58 0.60 (0.50–0.66) 0.70 (0.59–0.79) 0.47 (0.37–0.58) 0.59 (0.51–0.66) 0.57 (0.51–0.62) 0.61 (0.52–0.70) 63 43 48 27
PC(0:0/14:0) >0.22 0.70* (0.62–0.77) 0.80 (0.70–0.88) 0.51 (0.40–0.61) 0.65 (0.58–0.72) 0.62 (0.56–0.67) 0.72 (0.62–0.80) 72 46 45 18
SM(38:0) >1.16 0.71* (0.63–0.78) 0.74 (0.64–0.83) 0.64 (0.53–0.74) 0.69 (0.62–0.76) 0.67 (0.60–0.73) 0.72 (0.63–0.79) 67 58 33 23
Adiponectin + 9 lipids - 0.796** (0.73–0.86) 0.71 (0.61–0.80) 0.77 (0.67–0.85) 0.74 (0.67–0.80) 0.75 (0.67–0.82) 0.73 (0.66–0.79) 64 70 21 26
Adiponectin + 9 lipids (PNPLA3 rs738409 CC) - 0.832** (0.75–0.91) 0.70 (0.55–0.83) 0.88 (0.77–0.95) 0.802 (0.71–0.87) 0.83 (0.70–0.91) 0.79 (0.70–0.85) 33 52 7 14

Applied in the validation cohort, n = 181; PNPLA3 rs738409 CC carriers, n = 106. NASH is considered as positive if the levels of each parameter are superior or inferior to the cutoff value as indicated; for adiponectin, <7.32 μg/ml. p-values corrected with Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, assuming 5% false discovery rate.

CI, confidence interval; FN, false negative; FP, false positive; NAFL, nonalcoholic fatty liver; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; NPV, negative predictive value; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PPV, positive predictive value; TG, triglyceride; TN, true negative; TP, true positive; SM, sphingomyelin.

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01.